Pulse of the Grid
Played in 156 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
7.6% Azorius
All commanders (8)
- Krile Baldesion relevance 2.27 · 4.8% (19 of 397 decks)
- Noyan Dar, Roil Shaper relevance 1.50 · 2.1% (11 of 529 decks)
- Prince Imrahil the Fair relevance 1.35 · 2.7% (7 of 261 decks)
- Katerina of Myra's Marvels // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 1.27 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Niambi, Esteemed Speaker relevance 0.80 · 1.8% (3 of 171 decks)
- The First Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.60 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Ith, High Arcanist relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Sokka, Lateral Strategist relevance 0.35 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Catalog relevance 1.20 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 1.16 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Rain of Revelation relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 1.11 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.11 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 1.10 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 1.09 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 1.09 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.08 · 53.2% (83 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 1.05 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 1.04 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.03 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 1.01 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.00 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.00 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- View from Above relevance 0.99 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.99 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Scout's Warning relevance 0.97 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.96 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.96 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.96 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.96 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Read the Runes relevance 0.96 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Repeal relevance 0.96 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.95 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Radical Idea relevance 0.94 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.93 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.93 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Alchemist's Apprentice relevance 0.86 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 0.87 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
All instants (39)
- Catalog relevance 1.20 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 1.16 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Rain of Revelation relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 1.11 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.11 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 1.10 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 1.09 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 1.09 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.08 · 53.2% (83 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 1.06 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 1.04 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- View from Above relevance 0.99 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Scout's Warning relevance 0.97 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.96 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.96 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Faithful Mending relevance 0.96 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.96 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Read the Runes relevance 0.96 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Repeal relevance 0.96 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Radical Idea relevance 0.94 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.93 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.93 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 0.92 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 0.91 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.91 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Dismantling Blow relevance 0.90 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.90 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.90 · 18.6% (29 of 156 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 0.89 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Rowdy Research relevance 0.89 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 0.88 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- To Arms! relevance 0.88 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 0.88 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Delightful Discovery relevance 0.87 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 0.87 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 0.87 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 0.86 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 0.86 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 1.05 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.03 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 1.01 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.00 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.00 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.99 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.95 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
EDH data for Pulse of the Grid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 156 real decks.