Quirion Explorer
Played in 104 Dune-Brood decks
130+24+2+6+8+4+3+3+
Color Identity Spread
4.8% Dune-Brood
Commanders
Most Relevant
Sylvok Explorer 84.6% of decks
Sylvok Explorer 84.6% of decks
Grave Upheaval 72.1% of decks
Grave Upheaval 72.1% of decks
Grab the Reins 70.2% of decks
Grab the Reins 70.2% of decks
Den Protector 71.2% of decks
Den Protector 71.2% of decks
Zhur-Taa Druid 78.8% of decks
Zhur-Taa Druid 78.8% of decks
Dauntless Escort 81.7% of decks
Dauntless Escort 81.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Saskia the Unyielding relevance 0.93 · 2.3% (97 of 4,191 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvok Explorer relevance 3.66 · 84.6% (88 of 104 decks)
- Grave Upheaval relevance 3.30 · 72.1% (75 of 104 decks)
- Grab the Reins relevance 3.21 · 70.2% (73 of 104 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 3.19 · 71.2% (74 of 104 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 3.15 · 78.8% (82 of 104 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 3.04 · 81.7% (85 of 104 decks)
- Frenzied Fugue relevance 3.01 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 3.00 · 67.3% (70 of 104 decks)
- Charging Cinderhorn relevance 3.00 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 2.98 · 76.0% (79 of 104 decks)
- Wilderness Elemental relevance 2.96 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Wight of Precinct Six relevance 2.96 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 2.95 · 73.1% (76 of 104 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 2.95 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Order // Chaos relevance 2.93 · 70.2% (73 of 104 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 2.93 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 2.87 · 76.9% (80 of 104 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 2.86 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Treacherous Terrain relevance 2.86 · 61.5% (64 of 104 decks)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 2.84 · 66.3% (69 of 104 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 2.82 · 60.6% (63 of 104 decks)
- Korozda Guildmage relevance 2.81 · 63.5% (66 of 104 decks)
- Everlasting Torment relevance 2.78 · 63.5% (66 of 104 decks)
- Selesnya Guildmage relevance 2.77 · 58.7% (61 of 104 decks)
- Utter End relevance 2.76 · 83.7% (87 of 104 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 2.76 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Sunforger relevance 2.76 · 72.1% (75 of 104 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 2.75 · 77.9% (81 of 104 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender relevance 2.69 · 73.1% (76 of 104 decks)
- Brutal Hordechief relevance 2.62 · 76.0% (79 of 104 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Sylvok Explorer relevance 3.66 · 84.6% (88 of 104 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 3.19 · 71.2% (74 of 104 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 3.15 · 78.8% (82 of 104 decks)
- Dauntless Escort relevance 3.04 · 81.7% (85 of 104 decks)
- Charging Cinderhorn relevance 3.00 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 2.98 · 76.0% (79 of 104 decks)
- Wilderness Elemental relevance 2.96 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Wight of Precinct Six relevance 2.96 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 2.95 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 2.87 · 76.9% (80 of 104 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 2.86 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Wild Beastmaster relevance 2.84 · 66.3% (69 of 104 decks)
- Korozda Guildmage relevance 2.81 · 63.5% (66 of 104 decks)
- Selesnya Guildmage relevance 2.77 · 58.7% (61 of 104 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 2.76 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 2.75 · 77.9% (81 of 104 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender relevance 2.69 · 73.1% (76 of 104 decks)
- Brutal Hordechief relevance 2.62 · 76.0% (79 of 104 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 2.60 · 71.2% (74 of 104 decks)
- Thelonite Hermit relevance 2.57 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 2.39 · 77.9% (81 of 104 decks)
- Ankle Shanker relevance 2.33 · 76.0% (79 of 104 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 2.28 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Mycoloth relevance 2.23 · 70.2% (73 of 104 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sunforger relevance 2.76 · 72.1% (75 of 104 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 2.25 · 79.8% (83 of 104 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Frenzied Fugue relevance 3.01 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Everlasting Torment relevance 2.78 · 63.5% (66 of 104 decks)
- Breath of Fury relevance 2.60 · 65.4% (68 of 104 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 2.58 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Necrogenesis relevance 2.58 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 2.34 · 72.1% (75 of 104 decks)
All instants (8)
- Grab the Reins relevance 3.21 · 70.2% (73 of 104 decks)
- Sylvan Reclamation relevance 2.95 · 73.1% (76 of 104 decks)
- Order // Chaos relevance 2.93 · 70.2% (73 of 104 decks)
- Divergent Transformations relevance 2.82 · 60.6% (63 of 104 decks)
- Utter End relevance 2.76 · 83.7% (87 of 104 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 2.53 · 78.8% (82 of 104 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 2.36 · 79.8% (83 of 104 decks)
- Crackling Doom relevance 2.32 · 79.8% (83 of 104 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Grave Upheaval relevance 3.30 · 72.1% (75 of 104 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 3.00 · 67.3% (70 of 104 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 2.93 · 69.2% (72 of 104 decks)
- Treacherous Terrain relevance 2.86 · 61.5% (64 of 104 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 2.78 · 75.0% (78 of 104 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 2.47 · 73.1% (76 of 104 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 2.42 · 77.9% (81 of 104 decks)
All lands (3)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 2.63 · 76.0% (79 of 104 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 2.25 · 71.2% (74 of 104 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 2.24 · 70.2% (73 of 104 decks)
EDH data for Quirion Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 104 real decks.










































