Foil
Played in 1,000 Esper decks
Color Identity Spread
4.7% Esper
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (8)
- Toluz, Clever Conductor relevance 2.90 · 10.0% (100 of 1,002 decks)
- Hashaton, Scarab's Fist relevance 1.82 · 1.8% (223 of 12,118 decks)
- Ertai, the Corrupted relevance 0.70 · 1.5% (9 of 611 decks)
- The First Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.21 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Lady Evangela relevance 0.20 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Commandeer relevance 1.07 · 26.9% (269 of 1,000 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.98 · 28.0% (280 of 1,000 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.97 · 19.3% (193 of 1,000 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (149 of 1,000 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.85 · 50.9% (509 of 1,000 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.84 · 42.9% (429 of 1,000 decks)
- Hapless Researcher relevance 0.82 · 12.8% (128 of 1,000 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.78 · 14.7% (147 of 1,000 decks)
- M.O.D.O.K. relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (124 of 1,000 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.73 · 33.3% (333 of 1,000 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.73 · 24.4% (244 of 1,000 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (161 of 1,000 decks)
- Stern Constable relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (111 of 1,000 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.69 · 31.4% (314 of 1,000 decks)
- Gran-Gran relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (108 of 1,000 decks)
- Putrid Imp relevance 0.68 · 18.3% (183 of 1,000 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (108 of 1,000 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.66 · 23.9% (239 of 1,000 decks)
- Abolish relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (102 of 1,000 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (139 of 1,000 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (177 of 1,000 decks)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (155 of 1,000 decks)
- Tireless Tribe relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (154 of 1,000 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (121 of 1,000 decks)
- Doctor Octopus, Master Planner relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (104 of 1,000 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (161 of 1,000 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.60 · 34.2% (342 of 1,000 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.60 · 16.5% (165 of 1,000 decks)
- Bloodthorn Flail relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (102 of 1,000 decks)
- Eidolon of Rhetoric relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (135 of 1,000 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Hapless Researcher relevance 0.82 · 12.8% (128 of 1,000 decks)
- M.O.D.O.K. relevance 0.74 · 12.4% (124 of 1,000 decks)
- Stern Constable relevance 0.72 · 11.1% (111 of 1,000 decks)
- Gran-Gran relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (108 of 1,000 decks)
- Putrid Imp relevance 0.68 · 18.3% (183 of 1,000 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (108 of 1,000 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (139 of 1,000 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (177 of 1,000 decks)
- Tireless Tribe relevance 0.63 · 15.4% (154 of 1,000 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (121 of 1,000 decks)
- Doctor Octopus, Master Planner relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (104 of 1,000 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.60 · 16.5% (165 of 1,000 decks)
- Eidolon of Rhetoric relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (135 of 1,000 decks)
- Archon of Emeria relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (132 of 1,000 decks)
- Razaketh, the Foulblooded relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (139 of 1,000 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (109 of 1,000 decks)
- Baleful Force relevance 0.56 · 8.3% (83 of 1,000 decks)
- Ori, Plate Stacker relevance 0.56 · 8.7% (87 of 1,000 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.55 · 13.6% (136 of 1,000 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (155 of 1,000 decks)
- Bloodthorn Flail relevance 0.60 · 10.2% (102 of 1,000 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (133 of 1,000 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.54 · 22.4% (224 of 1,000 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.56 · 33.2% (332 of 1,000 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.55 · 25.2% (252 of 1,000 decks)
All instants (17)
- Commandeer relevance 1.07 · 26.9% (269 of 1,000 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.98 · 28.0% (280 of 1,000 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.97 · 19.3% (193 of 1,000 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (149 of 1,000 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.85 · 50.9% (509 of 1,000 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.84 · 42.9% (429 of 1,000 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.78 · 14.7% (147 of 1,000 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.73 · 33.3% (333 of 1,000 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.73 · 24.4% (244 of 1,000 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (161 of 1,000 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.69 · 31.4% (314 of 1,000 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.66 · 23.9% (239 of 1,000 decks)
- Abolish relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (102 of 1,000 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.62 · 16.1% (161 of 1,000 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.60 · 34.2% (342 of 1,000 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.58 · 20.6% (206 of 1,000 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.55 · 32.3% (323 of 1,000 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (157 of 1,000 decks)
All lands (7)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.62 · 25.3% (253 of 1,000 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.61 · 24.7% (247 of 1,000 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.60 · 24.4% (244 of 1,000 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.57 · 22.1% (221 of 1,000 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.56 · 21.5% (215 of 1,000 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.56 · 12.4% (124 of 1,000 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.55 · 21.1% (211 of 1,000 decks)
EDH data for Foil: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,000 real decks.