Scarwood Bandits
Played in 48 Green decks
830+20+9+3+4+6+
Color Identity Spread
21.8% Green
Commanders
Jedit Ojanen of Efrava 9.0% of decks
Jedit Ojanen of Efrava 9.0% of decks
Mirri, Cat Warrior 5.9% of decks
Mirri, Cat Warrior 5.9% of decks
Glissa Sunseeker 3.0% of decks
Glissa Sunseeker 3.0% of decks
Cazur, Ruthless Stalker 11.1% of decks
Cazur, Ruthless Stalker 11.1% of decks
Hulk, Brutal Brawler 2.9% of decks
Hulk, Brutal Brawler 2.9% of decks
Autumn Willow 2.6% of decks
Autumn Willow 2.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Yavimaya Dryad 41.7% of decks
Yavimaya Dryad 41.7% of decks
Mirri, Cat Warrior 27.1% of decks
Mirri, Cat Warrior 27.1% of decks
Jedit Ojanen of Efrava 25.0% of decks
Jedit Ojanen of Efrava 25.0% of decks
Nature's Cloak 16.7% of decks
Nature's Cloak 16.7% of decks
Uktabi Wildcats 16.7% of decks
Uktabi Wildcats 16.7% of decks
Weatherseed Elf 16.7% of decks
Weatherseed Elf 16.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 2.17 · 9.0% (6 of 67 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 1.86 · 5.9% (5 of 85 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 1.00 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.80 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Hulk, Brutal Brawler relevance 0.63 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 0.61 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.59 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.56 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 2.25 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 1.79 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 1.55 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Nature's Cloak relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 1.07 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Weatherseed Elf relevance 1.05 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.84 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.83 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.66 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.59 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.52 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.47 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.47 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.47 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.45 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.42 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.38 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.38 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 2.25 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 1.79 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 1.55 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 1.07 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Weatherseed Elf relevance 1.05 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.83 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.66 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.59 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.52 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.47 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.47 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.42 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.84 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.47 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.45 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.38 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
All instants (3)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.38 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Nature's Cloak relevance 1.11 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.37 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.62 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.50 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.38 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.33 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
EDH data for Scarwood Bandits: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 48 real decks.






































