Incremental Growth
Played in 120 Abzan decks
230+27+1+7+8+3+3+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Mer-Ek Nightblade 48.3% of decks
Mer-Ek Nightblade 48.3% of decks
Tuskguard Captain 53.3% of decks
Tuskguard Captain 53.3% of decks
Ainok Bond-Kin 52.5% of decks
Ainok Bond-Kin 52.5% of decks
Longshot Squad 39.2% of decks
Longshot Squad 39.2% of decks
Ivorytusk Fortress 50.0% of decks
Ivorytusk Fortress 50.0% of decks
Abzan Battle Priest 54.2% of decks
Abzan Battle Priest 54.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Anafenza, the Foremost relevance 3.01 · 6.0% (38 of 629 decks)
- Daghatar the Adamant relevance 2.12 · 6.3% (12 of 192 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 2.62 · 48.3% (58 of 120 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 2.45 · 53.3% (64 of 120 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 2.43 · 52.5% (63 of 120 decks)
- Longshot Squad relevance 2.40 · 39.2% (47 of 120 decks)
- Ivorytusk Fortress relevance 2.37 · 50.0% (60 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 2.35 · 54.2% (65 of 120 decks)
- High Sentinels of Arashin relevance 2.17 · 32.5% (39 of 120 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 2.11 · 35.8% (43 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 2.07 · 57.5% (69 of 120 decks)
- Elite Scaleguard relevance 1.99 · 34.2% (41 of 120 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 1.90 · 30.0% (36 of 120 decks)
- Feat of Resistance relevance 1.79 · 26.7% (32 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Banner relevance 1.78 · 39.2% (47 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 1.75 · 50.8% (61 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 1.60 · 58.3% (70 of 120 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 1.53 · 26.7% (32 of 120 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.43 · 20.8% (25 of 120 decks)
- Daghatar the Adamant relevance 1.42 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 1.36 · 29.2% (35 of 120 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.35 · 48.3% (58 of 120 decks)
- Duneblast relevance 1.35 · 34.2% (41 of 120 decks)
- Dragonscale General relevance 1.27 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Avatar of the Resolute relevance 1.25 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Anafenza, Kin-Tree Spirit relevance 1.21 · 25.8% (31 of 120 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.17 · 39.2% (47 of 120 decks)
- Herald of Anafenza relevance 1.09 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Kin-Tree Invocation relevance 1.00 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Warden of the First Tree relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (18 of 120 decks)
- Barrensteppe Siege relevance 0.96 · 25.8% (31 of 120 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 2.62 · 48.3% (58 of 120 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 2.45 · 53.3% (64 of 120 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 2.43 · 52.5% (63 of 120 decks)
- Longshot Squad relevance 2.40 · 39.2% (47 of 120 decks)
- Ivorytusk Fortress relevance 2.37 · 50.0% (60 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 2.35 · 54.2% (65 of 120 decks)
- High Sentinels of Arashin relevance 2.17 · 32.5% (39 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 2.07 · 57.5% (69 of 120 decks)
- Elite Scaleguard relevance 1.99 · 34.2% (41 of 120 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 1.53 · 26.7% (32 of 120 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.43 · 20.8% (25 of 120 decks)
- Daghatar the Adamant relevance 1.42 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Dragonscale General relevance 1.27 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Avatar of the Resolute relevance 1.25 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Anafenza, Kin-Tree Spirit relevance 1.21 · 25.8% (31 of 120 decks)
- Herald of Anafenza relevance 1.09 · 15.8% (19 of 120 decks)
- Warden of the First Tree relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (18 of 120 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.94 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Siege Rhino relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Disowned Ancestor relevance 0.89 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.77 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Dromoka, the Eternal relevance 0.77 · 12.5% (15 of 120 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.77 · 23.3% (28 of 120 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.76 · 21.7% (26 of 120 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.69 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Beastmaster relevance 0.66 · 20.0% (24 of 120 decks)
- Servant of the Scale relevance 0.66 · 10.0% (12 of 120 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Abzan Banner relevance 1.78 · 39.2% (47 of 120 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Citadel Siege relevance 2.11 · 35.8% (43 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 1.75 · 50.8% (61 of 120 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 1.36 · 29.2% (35 of 120 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.35 · 48.3% (58 of 120 decks)
- Barrensteppe Siege relevance 0.96 · 25.8% (31 of 120 decks)
- Gleam of Authority relevance 0.91 · 13.3% (16 of 120 decks)
- Frontier Siege relevance 0.72 · 10.8% (13 of 120 decks)
All instants (8)
- Feat of Resistance relevance 1.79 · 26.7% (32 of 120 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 1.60 · 58.3% (70 of 120 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.17 · 39.2% (47 of 120 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
- Harsh Sustenance relevance 0.94 · 14.2% (17 of 120 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.74 · 13.3% (16 of 120 decks)
- Utter End relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
- Kin-Tree Severance relevance 0.69 · 16.7% (20 of 120 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Map the Wastes relevance 1.90 · 30.0% (36 of 120 decks)
- Duneblast relevance 1.35 · 34.2% (41 of 120 decks)
- Kin-Tree Invocation relevance 1.00 · 19.2% (23 of 120 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 1.43 · 53.3% (64 of 120 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 1.41 · 52.5% (63 of 120 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 1.13 · 53.3% (64 of 120 decks)
All lands (1)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.76 · 18.3% (22 of 120 decks)
EDH data for Incremental Growth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 120 real decks.








































