Lakeshore Apothecary
Played in 46 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- Kang, Temporal Tyrant relevance 2.36 · 5.0% (9 of 180 decks)
- Tiger Shark, Abyssal Hunter relevance 0.68 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Locke Cole relevance 0.52 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (11)
- Roxxon Brutes relevance 2.26 · 34.8% (16 of 46 decks)
- Master's Councillors relevance 1.87 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Confusticate and Bebother relevance 1.65 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Bilbo's Deadly Slice relevance 1.27 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 1.19 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Visions of Villainy relevance 1.00 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Sneaky Snacker relevance 0.89 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.79 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.54 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
All creatures (3)
- Roxxon Brutes relevance 2.26 · 34.8% (16 of 46 decks)
- Master's Councillors relevance 1.87 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Sneaky Snacker relevance 0.89 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.79 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
All instants (6)
- Confusticate and Bebother relevance 1.65 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Bilbo's Deadly Slice relevance 1.27 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 1.19 · 19.6% (9 of 46 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Visions of Villainy relevance 1.00 · 17.4% (8 of 46 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.54 · 23.9% (11 of 46 decks)
All lands (2)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.56 · 28.3% (13 of 46 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.43 · 21.7% (10 of 46 decks)
EDH data for Lakeshore Apothecary: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 46 real decks.