Sunweb
Played in 43 Azorius decks
230+39+4+2+5+
Color Identity Spread
8.9% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Hover Barrier 46.5% of decks
Hover Barrier 46.5% of decks
Angelic Wall 46.5% of decks
Angelic Wall 46.5% of decks
Suspicious Bookcase 46.5% of decks
Suspicious Bookcase 46.5% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 44.2% of decks
Lu Xun, Scholar General 44.2% of decks
Ranger of Eos 46.5% of decks
Ranger of Eos 46.5% of decks
Weathered Sentinels 46.5% of decks
Weathered Sentinels 46.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.80 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.62 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hover Barrier relevance 3.16 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 3.06 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 3.03 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.00 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Ranger of Eos relevance 2.88 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 2.86 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 2.86 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.86 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Survival Cache relevance 2.86 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 2.84 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 2.84 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- The Fall of Lord Konda // Fragment of Konda relevance 2.79 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 2.77 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 2.77 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Temporary Truce relevance 2.75 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 2.74 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 2.73 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 2.73 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Riling Dawnbreaker // Signaling Roar relevance 2.72 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Summon: Primal Garuda relevance 2.72 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Stiltzkin, Moogle Merchant relevance 2.72 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Suspension Field relevance 2.72 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Serra's Guardian relevance 2.71 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Shattered Angel relevance 2.71 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Exile relevance 2.71 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Sublime Archangel relevance 2.70 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Worship relevance 2.69 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 2.69 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Tragic Poet relevance 2.68 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Sigarda's Vanguard relevance 2.68 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Hover Barrier relevance 3.16 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 3.06 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 3.03 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.00 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Ranger of Eos relevance 2.88 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 2.86 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.86 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Surtland Elementalist relevance 2.84 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- The Fall of Lord Konda // Fragment of Konda relevance 2.79 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 2.77 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 2.77 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Sword Coast Serpent // Capsizing Wave relevance 2.74 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 2.73 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 2.73 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Riling Dawnbreaker // Signaling Roar relevance 2.72 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Summon: Primal Garuda relevance 2.72 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Stiltzkin, Moogle Merchant relevance 2.72 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Serra's Guardian relevance 2.71 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Shattered Angel relevance 2.71 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Sublime Archangel relevance 2.70 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 2.69 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Tragic Poet relevance 2.68 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Sigarda's Vanguard relevance 2.68 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Serra Angel relevance 2.68 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Student of Ojutai relevance 2.67 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 2.67 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Totem-Guide Hartebeest relevance 2.67 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Tidal Force relevance 2.66 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 2.65 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.65 · 58.1% (25 of 43 decks)
- Suntail Hawk relevance 2.65 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Sister of Silence relevance 2.64 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 2.61 · 55.8% (24 of 43 decks)
- Sanctum Gargoyle relevance 2.61 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Sanctuary Warden relevance 2.60 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Sphinx of Uthuun relevance 2.58 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Space Marine Scout relevance 2.57 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Summon: Choco/Mog relevance 2.57 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 2.57 · 51.2% (22 of 43 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Suspension Field relevance 2.72 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Worship relevance 2.69 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 2.61 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Surgical Suite // Hospital Room relevance 2.57 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
All instants (2)
- Exile relevance 2.71 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Supplant Form relevance 2.64 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Recurring Insight relevance 2.86 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Survival Cache relevance 2.86 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 2.84 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Temporary Truce relevance 2.75 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 2.66 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
EDH data for Sunweb: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 43 real decks.































