Burnt Offering
Played in 6,147 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
18.2% Mardu
- Rakdos 12,278 · 36.3%
- Grixis 7,404 · 21.9%
- Mardu 6,147 · 18.2%
- Jund 3,829 · 11.3%
- Five-Color 3,674 · 10.9%
- Other (17) 521 · 1.5%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (29)
- Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Tymna the Weaver relevance 5.31 · 94.7% (2,328 of 2,457 decks)
- Celes, Rune Knight relevance 2.35 · 12.8% (1,055 of 8,215 decks)
- Jeska, Thrice Reborn // Tymna the Weaver relevance 2.09 · 24.0% (113 of 471 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Tymna the Weaver relevance 2.01 · 19.2% (145 of 754 decks)
- Dihada, Binder of Wills relevance 1.50 · 7.0% (430 of 6,142 decks)
- Piru, the Volatile relevance 1.36 · 9.5% (105 of 1,106 decks)
- Extus, Oriq Overlord // Awaken the Blood Avatar relevance 1.09 · 5.0% (213 of 4,250 decks)
- Kaalia of the Vast relevance 1.07 · 3.4% (836 of 24,622 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 1.02 · 31.8% (7 of 22 decks)
- Kroxa and Kunoros relevance 0.92 · 6.0% (55 of 911 decks)
- Licia, Sanguine Tribune relevance 0.58 · 3.0% (52 of 1,720 decks)
- Terra, Herald of Hope relevance 0.38 · 1.2% (194 of 16,125 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (9 of 269 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.34 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.31 · 4.6% (4 of 87 decks)
- Kaalia, Zenith Seeker relevance 0.30 · 2.2% (12 of 546 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Akiri, Line-Slinger relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (3 of 77 decks)
- Alesha, Who Smiles at Death relevance 0.23 · 1.1% (29 of 2,584 decks)
- Armix, Filigree Thrasher // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Malik, Grim Manipulator relevance 0.22 · 1.1% (24 of 2,120 decks)
- Tariel, Reckoner of Souls relevance 0.20 · 1.3% (12 of 922 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Tymna the Weaver // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.10 · 1.2% (3 of 255 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 0.10 · 1.2% (3 of 260 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.10 · 1.5% (2 of 131 decks)
- Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.09 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.07 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 2.22 · 65.6% (4,034 of 6,147 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 2.14 · 69.7% (4,283 of 6,147 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 2.10 · 62.7% (3,854 of 6,147 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 2.10 · 49.0% (3,013 of 6,147 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 2.06 · 55.6% (3,419 of 6,147 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 2.04 · 62.8% (3,859 of 6,147 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 2.03 · 53.2% (3,273 of 6,147 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 2.02 · 68.5% (4,210 of 6,147 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 1.99 · 70.0% (4,301 of 6,147 decks)
- Silence relevance 1.98 · 72.4% (4,453 of 6,147 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 1.98 · 64.1% (3,943 of 6,147 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 1.95 · 51.0% (3,138 of 6,147 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 1.93 · 60.8% (3,735 of 6,147 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 1.91 · 57.3% (3,521 of 6,147 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 1.87 · 51.7% (3,175 of 6,147 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.86 · 62.3% (3,830 of 6,147 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.86 · 55.7% (3,426 of 6,147 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 1.82 · 56.3% (3,460 of 6,147 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 1.80 · 56.3% (3,458 of 6,147 decks)
- Gamble relevance 1.78 · 65.3% (4,013 of 6,147 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 1.78 · 71.9% (4,418 of 6,147 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 1.77 · 43.9% (2,697 of 6,147 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 1.75 · 59.0% (3,625 of 6,147 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 1.70 · 51.6% (3,173 of 6,147 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 1.64 · 39.9% (2,455 of 6,147 decks)
- Static Prison relevance 1.60 · 36.4% (2,235 of 6,147 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 1.60 · 62.1% (3,818 of 6,147 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 1.59 · 47.5% (2,921 of 6,147 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 1.59 · 70.1% (4,306 of 6,147 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 1.59 · 40.7% (2,500 of 6,147 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 2.22 · 65.6% (4,034 of 6,147 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 2.04 · 62.8% (3,859 of 6,147 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 1.75 · 59.0% (3,625 of 6,147 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 1.70 · 51.6% (3,173 of 6,147 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 1.60 · 62.1% (3,818 of 6,147 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 1.59 · 70.1% (4,306 of 6,147 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 1.59 · 40.7% (2,500 of 6,147 decks)
- Altar of the Wretched // Wretched Bonemass relevance 1.57 · 34.0% (2,092 of 6,147 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 1.48 · 37.7% (2,319 of 6,147 decks)
- Greedy Freebooter relevance 1.47 · 34.7% (2,135 of 6,147 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 1.43 · 38.8% (2,384 of 6,147 decks)
All artifacts (10)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 2.03 · 53.2% (3,273 of 6,147 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 1.99 · 70.0% (4,301 of 6,147 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 1.98 · 64.1% (3,943 of 6,147 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 1.93 · 60.8% (3,735 of 6,147 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 1.91 · 57.3% (3,521 of 6,147 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.86 · 62.3% (3,830 of 6,147 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.86 · 55.7% (3,426 of 6,147 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 1.64 · 39.9% (2,455 of 6,147 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 1.59 · 47.5% (2,921 of 6,147 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 1.56 · 50.0% (3,072 of 6,147 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Underworld Breach relevance 2.14 · 69.7% (4,283 of 6,147 decks)
- Static Prison relevance 1.60 · 36.4% (2,235 of 6,147 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 1.49 · 51.1% (3,141 of 6,147 decks)
All instants (9)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 2.10 · 62.7% (3,854 of 6,147 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 2.10 · 49.0% (3,013 of 6,147 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 2.02 · 68.5% (4,210 of 6,147 decks)
- Silence relevance 1.98 · 72.4% (4,453 of 6,147 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 1.95 · 51.0% (3,138 of 6,147 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 1.87 · 51.7% (3,175 of 6,147 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 1.77 · 43.9% (2,697 of 6,147 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 1.48 · 88.0% (5,412 of 6,147 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 1.44 · 65.1% (4,002 of 6,147 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Rite of Flame relevance 2.06 · 55.6% (3,419 of 6,147 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 1.82 · 56.3% (3,460 of 6,147 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 1.80 · 56.3% (3,458 of 6,147 decks)
- Gamble relevance 1.78 · 65.3% (4,013 of 6,147 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 1.78 · 71.9% (4,418 of 6,147 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 1.55 · 67.6% (4,158 of 6,147 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 1.48 · 33.5% (2,062 of 6,147 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Emergence Zone relevance 1.55 · 40.9% (2,515 of 6,147 decks)
All lands (9)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 1.92 · 60.4% (3,711 of 6,147 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 1.73 · 41.7% (2,565 of 6,147 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.65 · 59.2% (3,640 of 6,147 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 1.64 · 60.6% (3,726 of 6,147 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 1.60 · 62.1% (3,816 of 6,147 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 1.57 · 55.9% (3,438 of 6,147 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 1.55 · 45.7% (2,807 of 6,147 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 1.53 · 65.5% (4,024 of 6,147 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 1.52 · 69.8% (4,288 of 6,147 decks)
EDH data for Burnt Offering: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,147 real decks.