Mossbridge Troll
Played in 187 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
8.0% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 2.15 · 2.7% (27 of 984 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.27 · 1.0% (14 of 1,382 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.06 · 2.0% (5 of 246 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.55 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.40 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.96 · 47.1% (88 of 187 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.82 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.74 · 31.6% (59 of 187 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.74 · 21.9% (41 of 187 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.72 · 38.0% (71 of 187 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 0.70 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.66 · 28.9% (54 of 187 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.65 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.64 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.62 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.62 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.62 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.59 · 31.6% (59 of 187 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.58 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.56 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.55 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.54 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.52 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.52 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.51 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.96 · 47.1% (88 of 187 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.82 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.74 · 31.6% (59 of 187 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.74 · 21.9% (41 of 187 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.72 · 38.0% (71 of 187 decks)
- Hamletback Goliath relevance 0.70 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.66 · 28.9% (54 of 187 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.65 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.65 · 21.4% (40 of 187 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.64 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 0.62 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.62 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.59 · 31.6% (59 of 187 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.58 · 20.3% (38 of 187 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 0.57 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.56 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.55 · 17.1% (32 of 187 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.54 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.53 · 13.4% (25 of 187 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.52 · 18.7% (35 of 187 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.52 · 16.6% (31 of 187 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (17 of 187 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.51 · 17.6% (33 of 187 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (22 of 187 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.49 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Challenger Troll relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (19 of 187 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.48 · 23.5% (44 of 187 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.48 · 8.6% (16 of 187 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.46 · 12.3% (23 of 187 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.46 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (37 of 187 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.44 · 12.8% (24 of 187 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.44 · 11.2% (21 of 187 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Mage Slayer relevance 0.46 · 15.5% (29 of 187 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.49 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
All instants (1)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.62 · 10.7% (20 of 187 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.63 · 44.4% (83 of 187 decks)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.55 · 22.5% (42 of 187 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.49 · 19.3% (36 of 187 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.44 · 14.4% (27 of 187 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.44 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
EDH data for Mossbridge Troll: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 187 real decks.