Final Fortune
Played in 5,242 Mardu decks
2230+9+9+3+10+6+1+12+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Tymna the Weaver 81.7% of decks
Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Tymna the Weaver 81.7% of decks
Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Tymna the Weaver 44.3% of decks
Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Tymna the Weaver 44.3% of decks
Krark, the Thumbless // Tymna the Weaver 59.9% of decks
Krark, the Thumbless // Tymna the Weaver 59.9% of decks
Jeska, Thrice Reborn // Tymna the Weaver 30.1% of decks
Jeska, Thrice Reborn // Tymna the Weaver 30.1% of decks
Dihada, Binder of Wills 10.4% of decks
Dihada, Binder of Wills 10.4% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 53.3% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 53.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Rite of Flame 75.7% of decks
Rite of Flame 75.7% of decks
Lion's Eye Diamond 73.8% of decks
Lion's Eye Diamond 73.8% of decks
Simian Spirit Guide 82.9% of decks
Simian Spirit Guide 82.9% of decks
Mox Opal 79.3% of decks
Mox Opal 79.3% of decks
Cabal Ritual 78.6% of decks
Cabal Ritual 78.6% of decks
Mana Vault 82.5% of decks
Mana Vault 82.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (22)
- Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Tymna the Weaver relevance 5.24 · 81.7% (2,016 of 2,469 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Tymna the Weaver relevance 3.36 · 44.3% (337 of 760 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Tymna the Weaver relevance 3.22 · 59.9% (163 of 272 decks)
- Jeska, Thrice Reborn // Tymna the Weaver relevance 2.52 · 30.1% (142 of 472 decks)
- Dihada, Binder of Wills relevance 2.14 · 10.4% (643 of 6,183 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.97 · 53.3% (24 of 45 decks)
- Celes, Rune Knight relevance 1.89 · 8.0% (663 of 8,259 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Akiri, Line-Slinger relevance 1.42 · 24.7% (19 of 77 decks)
- Tymna the Weaver // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.08 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Tymna the Weaver // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.87 · 11.1% (12 of 108 decks)
- Kaalia of the Vast relevance 0.78 · 2.1% (509 of 24,787 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (3 of 22 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.36 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.34 · 4.6% (4 of 87 decks)
- Jan Jansen, Chaos Crafter relevance 0.33 · 1.3% (39 of 2,925 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (4 of 195 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (3 of 135 decks)
- Vislor Turlough // The War Doctor relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.09 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.06 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Falthis, Shadowcat Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.05 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rite of Flame relevance 2.81 · 75.7% (3,969 of 5,242 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 2.81 · 73.8% (3,871 of 5,242 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 2.80 · 82.9% (4,344 of 5,242 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 2.64 · 79.3% (4,159 of 5,242 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 2.63 · 78.6% (4,118 of 5,242 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 2.62 · 82.5% (4,327 of 5,242 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 2.61 · 85.0% (4,455 of 5,242 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 2.59 · 77.7% (4,071 of 5,242 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 2.58 · 79.2% (4,154 of 5,242 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 2.53 · 84.7% (4,441 of 5,242 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 2.52 · 62.4% (3,271 of 5,242 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 2.51 · 69.1% (3,622 of 5,242 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 2.49 · 87.4% (4,580 of 5,242 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 2.49 · 77.7% (4,074 of 5,242 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 2.48 · 80.4% (4,215 of 5,242 decks)
- Silence relevance 2.43 · 88.9% (4,662 of 5,242 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 2.38 · 73.5% (3,854 of 5,242 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 2.32 · 78.6% (4,122 of 5,242 decks)
- Gamble relevance 2.28 · 83.7% (4,390 of 5,242 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 2.22 · 75.1% (3,938 of 5,242 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 2.21 · 67.0% (3,512 of 5,242 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 2.20 · 60.1% (3,151 of 5,242 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 2.20 · 70.3% (3,687 of 5,242 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 2.15 · 83.4% (4,372 of 5,242 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 2.11 · 51.4% (2,694 of 5,242 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 2.04 · 52.3% (2,742 of 5,242 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 2.00 · 68.8% (3,607 of 5,242 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 1.96 · 79.3% (4,158 of 5,242 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 1.94 · 85.7% (4,490 of 5,242 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 1.92 · 44.8% (2,351 of 5,242 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 2.80 · 82.9% (4,344 of 5,242 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 2.58 · 79.2% (4,154 of 5,242 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 2.22 · 75.1% (3,938 of 5,242 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 2.21 · 67.0% (3,512 of 5,242 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 2.15 · 83.4% (4,372 of 5,242 decks)
- Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty relevance 2.04 · 52.3% (2,742 of 5,242 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 1.94 · 85.7% (4,490 of 5,242 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 1.81 · 48.9% (2,564 of 5,242 decks)
- Hexing Squelcher relevance 1.79 · 57.7% (3,023 of 5,242 decks)
All artifacts (9)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 2.81 · 73.8% (3,871 of 5,242 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 2.64 · 79.3% (4,159 of 5,242 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 2.62 · 82.5% (4,327 of 5,242 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 2.59 · 77.7% (4,071 of 5,242 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 2.53 · 84.7% (4,441 of 5,242 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 2.49 · 87.4% (4,580 of 5,242 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 2.48 · 80.4% (4,215 of 5,242 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 2.20 · 70.3% (3,687 of 5,242 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 2.11 · 51.4% (2,694 of 5,242 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Underworld Breach relevance 2.61 · 85.0% (4,455 of 5,242 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 2.00 · 68.8% (3,607 of 5,242 decks)
- Static Prison relevance 1.92 · 43.5% (2,281 of 5,242 decks)
All instants (10)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 2.63 · 78.6% (4,118 of 5,242 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 2.52 · 62.4% (3,271 of 5,242 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 2.51 · 69.1% (3,622 of 5,242 decks)
- Silence relevance 2.43 · 88.9% (4,662 of 5,242 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 2.32 · 78.6% (4,122 of 5,242 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 2.20 · 60.1% (3,151 of 5,242 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 1.92 · 44.8% (2,351 of 5,242 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 1.90 · 86.3% (4,523 of 5,242 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 1.80 · 50.1% (2,628 of 5,242 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 1.75 · 88.7% (4,650 of 5,242 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Rite of Flame relevance 2.81 · 75.7% (3,969 of 5,242 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 2.49 · 77.7% (4,074 of 5,242 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 2.38 · 73.5% (3,854 of 5,242 decks)
- Gamble relevance 2.28 · 83.7% (4,390 of 5,242 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 1.96 · 79.3% (4,158 of 5,242 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 1.87 · 81.7% (4,281 of 5,242 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Emergence Zone relevance 1.88 · 49.6% (2,600 of 5,242 decks)
All lands (12)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 2.61 · 82.0% (4,300 of 5,242 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 2.46 · 59.6% (3,126 of 5,242 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 2.16 · 83.7% (4,388 of 5,242 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 2.15 · 77.0% (4,035 of 5,242 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 2.08 · 77.0% (4,035 of 5,242 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 2.03 · 59.7% (3,132 of 5,242 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 2.03 · 72.0% (3,773 of 5,242 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 1.95 · 83.5% (4,376 of 5,242 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 1.89 · 86.7% (4,547 of 5,242 decks)
- Plateau relevance 1.76 · 80.7% (4,231 of 5,242 decks)
- Badlands relevance 1.75 · 81.0% (4,246 of 5,242 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 1.75 · 80.7% (4,230 of 5,242 decks)
EDH data for Final Fortune: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,242 real decks.




























































