Pendrell Drake
Played in 35 Azorius decks
130+17+1+5+17+7+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
19.8% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
New Perspectives 68.6% of decks
New Perspectives 68.6% of decks
Flourishing Fox 62.9% of decks
Flourishing Fox 62.9% of decks
Curator of Mysteries 71.4% of decks
Curator of Mysteries 71.4% of decks
Trade the Helm 60.0% of decks
Trade the Helm 60.0% of decks
Boon of the Wish-Giver 65.7% of decks
Boon of the Wish-Giver 65.7% of decks
Miscalculation 65.7% of decks
Miscalculation 65.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- The First Doctor // Jo Grant relevance 0.91 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- New Perspectives relevance 4.38 · 68.6% (24 of 35 decks)
- Flourishing Fox relevance 4.28 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 4.28 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Trade the Helm relevance 4.11 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 4.06 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 3.96 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Avian Oddity relevance 3.95 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Pondering Mage relevance 3.92 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 3.83 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- A.I.M. Scientists relevance 3.82 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 3.77 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Astral Drift relevance 3.76 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Gallant Strike relevance 3.75 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.74 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 3.74 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 3.73 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 3.70 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 3.70 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 3.68 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Glassdust Hulk relevance 3.67 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Lightshield Parry relevance 3.67 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Splendor Mare relevance 3.66 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Fluctuator relevance 3.64 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 3.63 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 3.63 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Portent relevance 3.62 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 3.61 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.61 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Invasion of Kamigawa // Rooftop Saboteurs relevance 3.61 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Pore Over the Pages relevance 3.60 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Flourishing Fox relevance 4.28 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 4.28 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Avian Oddity relevance 3.95 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Pondering Mage relevance 3.92 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- A.I.M. Scientists relevance 3.82 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 3.77 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 3.74 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Glassdust Hulk relevance 3.67 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Splendor Mare relevance 3.66 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 3.63 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 3.61 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Peri Brown relevance 3.54 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Owl Familiar relevance 3.52 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.50 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Oracle of Tragedy relevance 3.45 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 3.43 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Palace Familiar relevance 3.43 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Fluctuator relevance 3.64 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- New Perspectives relevance 4.38 · 68.6% (24 of 35 decks)
- Astral Drift relevance 3.76 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 3.70 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Nightmares and Daydreams relevance 3.53 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Cast Out relevance 3.45 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
All instants (17)
- Miscalculation relevance 3.96 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Gallant Strike relevance 3.75 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.74 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 3.73 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 3.70 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 3.68 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Lightshield Parry relevance 3.67 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 3.63 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.61 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 3.59 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 3.52 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Repeal relevance 3.51 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Peek relevance 3.51 · 68.6% (24 of 35 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 3.50 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Oona's Grace relevance 3.50 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Censor relevance 3.47 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 3.45 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Trade the Helm relevance 4.11 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 4.06 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 3.83 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Portent relevance 3.62 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Pore Over the Pages relevance 3.60 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 3.55 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Spectacular Pileup relevance 3.48 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Kamigawa // Rooftop Saboteurs relevance 3.61 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 3.59 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Night Market relevance 3.46 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
EDH data for Pendrell Drake: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 35 real decks.















































