Vitalizing Wind
Played in 77 Selesnya decks
230+31+1+7+3+6+2+
Color Identity Spread
2.3% Selesnya
-
Golgari 2,025 · 61.5%
-
Gruul 577 · 17.5%
-
Green 362 · 11.0%
-
Selesnya 77 · 2.3%
- Other (13) 254 · 7.7%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Quakestrider Ceratops 29.9% of decks
Quakestrider Ceratops 29.9% of decks
Terrian, World Tyrant 27.3% of decks
Terrian, World Tyrant 27.3% of decks
Gigantosaurus 27.3% of decks
Gigantosaurus 27.3% of decks
Watchwolf 27.3% of decks
Watchwolf 27.3% of decks
Muraganda Petroglyphs 26.0% of decks
Muraganda Petroglyphs 26.0% of decks
Ruxa, Patient Professor 26.0% of decks
Ruxa, Patient Professor 26.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.86 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Daughter of Autumn relevance 0.50 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.15 · 29.9% (23 of 77 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.07 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.05 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.05 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.01 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.00 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.94 · 23.4% (18 of 77 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.89 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.87 · 20.8% (16 of 77 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (16 of 77 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.78 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.74 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.72 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.67 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (18 of 77 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.67 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.65 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.61 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.61 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 0.61 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.60 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 0.60 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Might of Oaks relevance 0.59 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.15 · 29.9% (23 of 77 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.07 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.05 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.05 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.00 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.94 · 23.4% (18 of 77 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.89 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.87 · 20.8% (16 of 77 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.85 · 20.8% (16 of 77 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.78 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.74 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.72 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.67 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.67 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.65 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.61 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 0.61 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 0.60 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.55 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 0.50 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Wilt-Leaf Liege relevance 0.48 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.01 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.74 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (18 of 77 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.61 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.44 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
All instants (3)
- Might of Oaks relevance 0.59 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.55 · 23.4% (18 of 77 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.60 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.57 · 18.2% (14 of 77 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.56 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.56 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.49 · 37.7% (29 of 77 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.44 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.47 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
EDH data for Vitalizing Wind: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 77 real decks.






































