2230+44+1+2+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Voja, Jaws of the Conclave 19.4% of decks
Voja, Jaws of the Conclave 19.4% of decks
Samut, Voice of Dissent 7.9% of decks
Samut, Voice of Dissent 7.9% of decks
Jetmir, Nexus of Revels 4.3% of decks
Jetmir, Nexus of Revels 4.3% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 19.6% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 19.6% of decks
Mayael the Anima 3.9% of decks
Mayael the Anima 3.9% of decks
Havi, the All-Father 3.8% of decks
Havi, the All-Father 3.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Priest of Titania 56.7% of decks
Priest of Titania 56.7% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 51.1% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 51.1% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 52.5% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 52.5% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 42.1% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 42.1% of decks
Shalai and Hallar 52.9% of decks
Shalai and Hallar 52.9% of decks
Elvish Mystic 64.1% of decks
Elvish Mystic 64.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (22)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 3.99 · 19.4% (1,884 of 9,706 decks)
- Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 1.65 · 7.9% (81 of 1,031 decks)
- Jetmir, Nexus of Revels relevance 1.50 · 4.3% (205 of 4,772 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.27 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 1.17 · 3.9% (80 of 2,064 decks)
- Havi, the All-Father relevance 0.94 · 3.8% (34 of 888 decks)
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.86 · 4.6% (18 of 394 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.83 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.81 · 5.7% (11 of 192 decks)
- Tifa, Martial Artist relevance 0.69 · 1.6% (84 of 5,300 decks)
- Kaust, Eyes of the Glade relevance 0.55 · 1.8% (26 of 1,465 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.54 · 2.5% (12 of 473 decks)
- Emperor Apatzec Intli IV relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Huatli, Poet of Unity // Roar of the Fifth People relevance 0.30 · 1.2% (10 of 839 decks)
- The Fugitive Doctor // Sarah Jane Smith relevance 0.30 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Val, Marooned Surveyor relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.15 · 1.3% (2 of 153 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.09 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.09 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.08 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.88 · 56.7% (1,740 of 3,069 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.82 · 51.1% (1,569 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.80 · 52.5% (1,610 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.58 · 42.1% (1,292 of 3,069 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.53 · 52.9% (1,625 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.49 · 64.1% (1,967 of 3,069 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.46 · 35.8% (1,100 of 3,069 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.43 · 32.6% (1,000 of 3,069 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.41 · 50.3% (1,545 of 3,069 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.40 · 55.3% (1,698 of 3,069 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.31 · 68.2% (2,094 of 3,069 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 1.31 · 48.1% (1,476 of 3,069 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.17 · 29.2% (897 of 3,069 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.17 · 29.8% (916 of 3,069 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.16 · 34.5% (1,059 of 3,069 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.14 · 33.3% (1,023 of 3,069 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.14 · 31.6% (971 of 3,069 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 1.12 · 46.7% (1,433 of 3,069 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.09 · 40.0% (1,228 of 3,069 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.07 · 25.9% (796 of 3,069 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.06 · 37.5% (1,152 of 3,069 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 1.05 · 44.5% (1,367 of 3,069 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.05 · 34.7% (1,065 of 3,069 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 1.04 · 24.9% (764 of 3,069 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (784 of 3,069 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.01 · 21.3% (655 of 3,069 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.98 · 39.0% (1,198 of 3,069 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.97 · 23.2% (712 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.96 · 20.5% (630 of 3,069 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.96 · 30.5% (937 of 3,069 decks)
All creatures (44)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.88 · 56.7% (1,740 of 3,069 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.82 · 51.1% (1,569 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.80 · 52.5% (1,610 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.58 · 42.1% (1,292 of 3,069 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.53 · 52.9% (1,625 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.49 · 64.1% (1,967 of 3,069 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.46 · 35.8% (1,100 of 3,069 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.43 · 32.6% (1,000 of 3,069 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.41 · 50.3% (1,545 of 3,069 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.40 · 55.3% (1,698 of 3,069 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.31 · 68.2% (2,094 of 3,069 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 1.31 · 48.1% (1,476 of 3,069 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.17 · 29.2% (897 of 3,069 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.17 · 29.8% (916 of 3,069 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.16 · 34.5% (1,059 of 3,069 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.14 · 33.3% (1,023 of 3,069 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.14 · 31.6% (971 of 3,069 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 1.12 · 46.7% (1,433 of 3,069 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.09 · 40.0% (1,228 of 3,069 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.07 · 25.9% (796 of 3,069 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.06 · 37.5% (1,152 of 3,069 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.05 · 34.7% (1,065 of 3,069 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 1.04 · 24.9% (764 of 3,069 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (784 of 3,069 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.01 · 21.3% (655 of 3,069 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.98 · 39.0% (1,198 of 3,069 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.97 · 23.2% (712 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.96 · 20.5% (630 of 3,069 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.95 · 23.3% (716 of 3,069 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (703 of 3,069 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.90 · 28.3% (869 of 3,069 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.90 · 24.3% (746 of 3,069 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.89 · 22.2% (682 of 3,069 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.85 · 25.9% (796 of 3,069 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.83 · 16.4% (503 of 3,069 decks)
- Wolf-Skull Shaman relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (558 of 3,069 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.80 · 16.5% (505 of 3,069 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.79 · 16.9% (519 of 3,069 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 20.9% (640 of 3,069 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.76 · 18.7% (574 of 3,069 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.75 · 27.7% (849 of 3,069 decks)
- Wren's Run Packmaster relevance 0.75 · 16.8% (516 of 3,069 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.73 · 14.6% (448 of 3,069 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.72 · 31.0% (950 of 3,069 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 1.05 · 44.5% (1,367 of 3,069 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.96 · 30.5% (937 of 3,069 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 57.9% (1,777 of 3,069 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.78 · 33.1% (1,015 of 3,069 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.72 · 15.4% (472 of 3,069 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.75 · 22.9% (704 of 3,069 decks)
EDH data for Eladamri, Korvecdal: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,069 real decks.







































