Consuming Ashes
Played in 77 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
5.1% Sultai
30+15+4+5+12+3+7+4+
All most relevant (30)
- Charnel Serenade relevance 1.14 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 1.10 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.98 · 24.7% (19 of 77 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.94 · 24.7% (19 of 77 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.93 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Cruel Truths relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.70 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 0.69 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Spellgyre relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Dogged Detective relevance 0.69 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Gurmag Nightwatch relevance 0.67 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Titans' Nest relevance 0.66 · 18.2% (14 of 77 decks)
- Dimir Strandcatcher relevance 0.66 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Deeproot Wayfinder relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.63 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.62 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.61 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Pile On relevance 0.61 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.60 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.60 · 31.2% (24 of 77 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.55 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.94 · 24.7% (19 of 77 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.93 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.70 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 0.69 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Dogged Detective relevance 0.69 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Gurmag Nightwatch relevance 0.67 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Dimir Strandcatcher relevance 0.66 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Deeproot Wayfinder relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.60 · 31.2% (24 of 77 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.48 · 24.7% (19 of 77 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Essence Anchor relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.41 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.98 · 24.7% (19 of 77 decks)
- Titans' Nest relevance 0.66 · 18.2% (14 of 77 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.60 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.45 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.42 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
All instants (12)
- Price of Fame relevance 1.10 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Cruel Truths relevance 0.91 · 14.3% (11 of 77 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Spellgyre relevance 0.69 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 0.68 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.63 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.61 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Pile On relevance 0.61 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.55 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (9 of 77 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.48 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Charnel Serenade relevance 1.14 · 16.9% (13 of 77 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.62 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Death Begets Life relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (12 of 77 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.16 · 22.1% (17 of 77 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.99 · 20.8% (16 of 77 decks)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.92 · 19.5% (15 of 77 decks)
- Sinister Hideout relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (8 of 77 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.43 · 13.0% (10 of 77 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (18 of 77 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.42 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
All lands (4)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.82 · 27.3% (21 of 77 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.74 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.74 · 26.0% (20 of 77 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.63 · 44.2% (34 of 77 decks)
EDH data for Consuming Ashes: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 77 real decks.


















































