Burning Anger
Played in 314 Naya decks
430+16+30+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Uril, the Miststalker 3.8% of decks
Uril, the Miststalker 3.8% of decks
Preston Garvey, Minuteman 1.9% of decks
Preston Garvey, Minuteman 1.9% of decks
Mazzy, Truesword Paladin 1.8% of decks
Mazzy, Truesword Paladin 1.8% of decks
Jared Carthalion, True Heir 1.1% of decks
Jared Carthalion, True Heir 1.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Ethereal Armor 35.7% of decks
Ethereal Armor 35.7% of decks
Ancestral Mask 33.4% of decks
Ancestral Mask 33.4% of decks
Sage's Reverie 25.8% of decks
Sage's Reverie 25.8% of decks
Sythis, Harvest's Hand 29.9% of decks
Sythis, Harvest's Hand 29.9% of decks
Winds of Rath 26.8% of decks
Winds of Rath 26.8% of decks
All That Glitters 35.4% of decks
All That Glitters 35.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Uril, the Miststalker relevance 3.04 · 3.8% (108 of 2,830 decks)
- Preston Garvey, Minuteman relevance 1.58 · 1.9% (20 of 1,067 decks)
- Mazzy, Truesword Paladin relevance 1.57 · 1.8% (20 of 1,083 decks)
- Jared Carthalion, True Heir relevance 1.26 · 1.1% (18 of 1,638 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 1.43 · 35.7% (112 of 314 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.41 · 33.4% (105 of 314 decks)
- Sage's Reverie relevance 1.14 · 25.8% (81 of 314 decks)
- Sythis, Harvest's Hand relevance 1.14 · 29.9% (94 of 314 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 1.13 · 26.8% (84 of 314 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 1.13 · 35.4% (111 of 314 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 1.12 · 27.1% (85 of 314 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 1.10 · 27.1% (85 of 314 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 1.07 · 24.8% (78 of 314 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 1.03 · 26.4% (83 of 314 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.03 · 24.2% (76 of 314 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 1.02 · 26.1% (82 of 314 decks)
- Pearl-Ear, Imperial Advisor relevance 1.02 · 23.2% (73 of 314 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 1.01 · 25.2% (79 of 314 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.98 · 24.5% (77 of 314 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.97 · 29.6% (93 of 314 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.96 · 27.7% (87 of 314 decks)
- Kor Spiritdancer relevance 0.96 · 22.0% (69 of 314 decks)
- Daybreak Coronet relevance 0.91 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Jukai Naturalist relevance 0.89 · 21.0% (66 of 314 decks)
- Unflinching Courage relevance 0.87 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.87 · 20.7% (65 of 314 decks)
- Timely Ward relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (58 of 314 decks)
- Satyr Enchanter relevance 0.84 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (50 of 314 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.81 · 18.8% (59 of 314 decks)
- Hyena Umbra relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (54 of 314 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.79 · 17.5% (55 of 314 decks)
- Runes of the Deus relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (47 of 314 decks)
- Retether relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (47 of 314 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Sythis, Harvest's Hand relevance 1.14 · 29.9% (94 of 314 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.03 · 24.2% (76 of 314 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 1.02 · 26.1% (82 of 314 decks)
- Pearl-Ear, Imperial Advisor relevance 1.02 · 23.2% (73 of 314 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.98 · 24.5% (77 of 314 decks)
- Kor Spiritdancer relevance 0.96 · 22.0% (69 of 314 decks)
- Jukai Naturalist relevance 0.89 · 21.0% (66 of 314 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.87 · 20.7% (65 of 314 decks)
- Satyr Enchanter relevance 0.84 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Umbra Mystic relevance 0.76 · 15.3% (48 of 314 decks)
- Transcendent Envoy relevance 0.75 · 14.0% (44 of 314 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (45 of 314 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.69 · 16.2% (51 of 314 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.67 · 13.1% (41 of 314 decks)
- Eidolon of Countless Battles relevance 0.66 · 11.5% (36 of 314 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.62 · 12.4% (39 of 314 decks)
All enchantments (30)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 1.43 · 35.7% (112 of 314 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.41 · 33.4% (105 of 314 decks)
- Sage's Reverie relevance 1.14 · 25.8% (81 of 314 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 1.13 · 35.4% (111 of 314 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 1.12 · 27.1% (85 of 314 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 1.10 · 27.1% (85 of 314 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 1.07 · 24.8% (78 of 314 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 1.03 · 26.4% (83 of 314 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 1.01 · 25.2% (79 of 314 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.97 · 29.6% (93 of 314 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.96 · 27.7% (87 of 314 decks)
- Daybreak Coronet relevance 0.91 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Unflinching Courage relevance 0.87 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Timely Ward relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (58 of 314 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.81 · 15.9% (50 of 314 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.81 · 18.8% (59 of 314 decks)
- Hyena Umbra relevance 0.80 · 17.2% (54 of 314 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.79 · 17.5% (55 of 314 decks)
- Runes of the Deus relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (47 of 314 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.72 · 14.0% (44 of 314 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.71 · 18.2% (57 of 314 decks)
- Mantle of the Ancients relevance 0.67 · 20.4% (64 of 314 decks)
- Angelic Destiny relevance 0.66 · 12.4% (39 of 314 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.66 · 19.4% (61 of 314 decks)
- Unquestioned Authority relevance 0.65 · 13.7% (43 of 314 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.65 · 18.8% (59 of 314 decks)
- Demonic Ruckus relevance 0.63 · 11.8% (37 of 314 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (38 of 314 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.62 · 12.4% (39 of 314 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.61 · 9.9% (31 of 314 decks)
All instants (1)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (34 of 314 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Winds of Rath relevance 1.13 · 26.8% (84 of 314 decks)
- Retether relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (47 of 314 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.93 · 25.5% (80 of 314 decks)
EDH data for Burning Anger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 314 real decks.


































