Psionic Snoop
Played in 100 Esper decks
130+21+2+7+10+3+3+4+
Color Identity Spread
26.2% Esper
Commanders
Most Relevant
Obscura Interceptor 57.0% of decks
Obscura Interceptor 57.0% of decks
Security Bypass 56.0% of decks
Security Bypass 56.0% of decks
Nimble Larcenist 41.0% of decks
Nimble Larcenist 41.0% of decks
Shattered Seraph 41.0% of decks
Shattered Seraph 41.0% of decks
Toluz, Clever Conductor 43.0% of decks
Toluz, Clever Conductor 43.0% of decks
Body Launderer 38.0% of decks
Body Launderer 38.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.49 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Obscura Interceptor relevance 3.17 · 57.0% (57 of 100 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 3.12 · 56.0% (56 of 100 decks)
- Nimble Larcenist relevance 2.57 · 41.0% (41 of 100 decks)
- Shattered Seraph relevance 2.57 · 41.0% (41 of 100 decks)
- Toluz, Clever Conductor relevance 2.40 · 43.0% (43 of 100 decks)
- Body Launderer relevance 2.13 · 38.0% (38 of 100 decks)
- Obscura Confluence relevance 2.09 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 2.01 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Obscura Charm relevance 1.86 · 47.0% (47 of 100 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 1.86 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Obscura Ascendancy relevance 1.66 · 25.0% (25 of 100 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 1.54 · 57.0% (57 of 100 decks)
- Kamiz, Obscura Oculus relevance 1.36 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 1.36 · 24.0% (24 of 100 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 1.34 · 25.0% (25 of 100 decks)
- All-Seeing Arbiter relevance 1.17 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Queza, Augur of Agonies relevance 1.14 · 38.0% (38 of 100 decks)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 1.10 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Jailbreak relevance 1.08 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Scheming Fence relevance 1.07 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Scurrilous Sentry relevance 1.06 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Public Enemy relevance 1.03 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 0.99 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Depopulate relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Lethal Scheme relevance 0.95 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.95 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.94 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Inspiring Overseer relevance 0.88 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Obscura Interceptor relevance 3.17 · 57.0% (57 of 100 decks)
- Nimble Larcenist relevance 2.57 · 41.0% (41 of 100 decks)
- Shattered Seraph relevance 2.57 · 41.0% (41 of 100 decks)
- Toluz, Clever Conductor relevance 2.40 · 43.0% (43 of 100 decks)
- Body Launderer relevance 2.13 · 38.0% (38 of 100 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 1.54 · 57.0% (57 of 100 decks)
- Kamiz, Obscura Oculus relevance 1.36 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 1.36 · 24.0% (24 of 100 decks)
- All-Seeing Arbiter relevance 1.17 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Queza, Augur of Agonies relevance 1.14 · 38.0% (38 of 100 decks)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 1.10 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Scheming Fence relevance 1.07 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Scurrilous Sentry relevance 1.06 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.95 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Inspiring Overseer relevance 0.88 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Skyway Robber relevance 0.78 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Tivit, Seller of Secrets relevance 0.67 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Misfortune Teller relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Raffine, Scheming Seer relevance 0.53 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Aerial Extortionist relevance 0.52 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 2.01 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.94 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Security Bypass relevance 3.12 · 56.0% (56 of 100 decks)
- Obscura Ascendancy relevance 1.66 · 25.0% (25 of 100 decks)
- Public Enemy relevance 1.03 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 0.99 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.74 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Life Insurance relevance 0.60 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
All instants (10)
- Obscura Confluence relevance 2.09 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Obscura Charm relevance 1.86 · 47.0% (47 of 100 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 1.86 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 1.34 · 25.0% (25 of 100 decks)
- Lethal Scheme relevance 0.95 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.85 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.73 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.71 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Boon of Safety relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Jailbreak relevance 1.08 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Depopulate relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Writ of Return relevance 0.78 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Waterfront District relevance 1.95 · 38.0% (38 of 100 decks)
- Skybridge Towers relevance 1.49 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.99 · 25.0% (25 of 100 decks)
All lands (4)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 1.27 · 46.0% (46 of 100 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.66 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.62 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.56 · 19.0% (19 of 100 decks)
EDH data for Psionic Snoop: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 100 real decks.














































