Deep Reconnaissance
Played in 165 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (5)
- Vhati il-Dal relevance 0.86 · 1.4% (3 of 214 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.48 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Acornelia, Fashionable Filcher relevance 0.43 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.41 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.81 · 15.8% (26 of 165 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.81 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (21 of 165 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (16 of 165 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.50 · 36.4% (60 of 165 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.49 · 26.7% (44 of 165 decks)
- Crawl from the Cellar relevance 0.49 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- Diregraf Rebirth relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (23 of 165 decks)
- Nantuko Elder relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (16 of 165 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (25 of 165 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (10 of 165 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- Eviscerator's Insight relevance 0.40 · 8.5% (14 of 165 decks)
- Gnaw to the Bone relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (11 of 165 decks)
- Saber Ants relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (14 of 165 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (20 of 165 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (34 of 165 decks)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (9 of 165 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Nantuko Elder relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (16 of 165 decks)
- Saber Ants relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (14 of 165 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (20 of 165 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Blightbeetle relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (14 of 165 decks)
- Huskburster Swarm relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (14 of 165 decks)
- Flesh Burrower relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Quarry Beetle relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (9 of 165 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 10.9% (18 of 165 decks)
- Golgari Locket relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.36 · 10.9% (18 of 165 decks)
- Crawling Infestation relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (17 of 165 decks)
All instants (6)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (16 of 165 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (25 of 165 decks)
- Eviscerator's Insight relevance 0.40 · 8.5% (14 of 165 decks)
- Gnaw to the Bone relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (11 of 165 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- Natural Connection relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (9 of 165 decks)
All sorceries (24)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.81 · 15.8% (26 of 165 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.81 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.67 · 14.5% (24 of 165 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.60 · 12.7% (21 of 165 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.53 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.50 · 36.4% (60 of 165 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.49 · 26.7% (44 of 165 decks)
- Crawl from the Cellar relevance 0.49 · 7.3% (12 of 165 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- Diregraf Rebirth relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 0.45 · 13.9% (23 of 165 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.44 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.42 · 6.1% (10 of 165 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (34 of 165 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (10 of 165 decks)
- Increasing Ambition relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (13 of 165 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (9 of 165 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (22 of 165 decks)
- Parallel Evolution relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (11 of 165 decks)
- Spider Spawning relevance 0.35 · 9.1% (15 of 165 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (17 of 165 decks)
All lands (4)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.48 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 29.7% (49 of 165 decks)
- Festering Gulch relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (20 of 165 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (16 of 165 decks)
EDH data for Deep Reconnaissance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 165 real decks.