Imperial Edict
Played in 54 Black decks
530+8+2+8+12+14+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
39.7% Black
Commanders
Cao Cao, Lord of Wei 14.6% of decks
Cao Cao, Lord of Wei 14.6% of decks
Zhang He, Wei General 18.2% of decks
Zhang He, Wei General 18.2% of decks
Sima Yi, Wei Field Marshal 6.9% of decks
Sima Yi, Wei Field Marshal 6.9% of decks
Cao Ren, Wei Commander 5.3% of decks
Cao Ren, Wei Commander 5.3% of decks
Akuta, Born of Ash 3.3% of decks
Akuta, Born of Ash 3.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Cruel Edict 33.3% of decks
Cruel Edict 33.3% of decks
Xiahou Dun, the One-Eyed 31.5% of decks
Xiahou Dun, the One-Eyed 31.5% of decks
Chainer's Edict 33.3% of decks
Chainer's Edict 33.3% of decks
Corrupt Court Official 33.3% of decks
Corrupt Court Official 33.3% of decks
Diabolic Edict 37.0% of decks
Diabolic Edict 37.0% of decks
Coercion 24.1% of decks
Coercion 24.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Cao Cao, Lord of Wei relevance 3.33 · 14.6% (14 of 96 decks)
- Zhang He, Wei General relevance 1.40 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- Sima Yi, Wei Field Marshal relevance 1.20 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Cao Ren, Wei Commander relevance 0.72 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Akuta, Born of Ash relevance 0.66 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cruel Edict relevance 2.03 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Xiahou Dun, the One-Eyed relevance 1.71 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Chainer's Edict relevance 1.71 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Corrupt Court Official relevance 1.70 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Diabolic Edict relevance 1.65 · 37.0% (20 of 54 decks)
- Coercion relevance 1.55 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Overwhelming Forces relevance 1.39 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
- Sudden Edict relevance 1.18 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.84 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Myrkul's Edict relevance 0.81 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Ambition's Cost relevance 0.79 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Sheoldred's Edict relevance 0.74 · 38.9% (21 of 54 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.59 · 35.2% (19 of 54 decks)
- Waste Not relevance 0.58 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.58 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.54 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Plaguecrafter relevance 0.49 · 29.6% (16 of 54 decks)
- Fleshbag Marauder relevance 0.48 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.47 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Oppression relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Soul Shatter relevance 0.44 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Black Market relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Sangromancer relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Accursed Marauder relevance 0.42 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Xiahou Dun, the One-Eyed relevance 1.71 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Corrupt Court Official relevance 1.70 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Plaguecrafter relevance 0.49 · 29.6% (16 of 54 decks)
- Fleshbag Marauder relevance 0.48 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Sangromancer relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Accursed Marauder relevance 0.42 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Nirkana Revenant relevance 0.37 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.60 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.59 · 35.2% (19 of 54 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Waste Not relevance 0.58 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Megrim relevance 0.58 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Liliana's Caress relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Oppression relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Black Market relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Painful Quandary relevance 0.36 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Exquisite Blood relevance 0.31 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
All instants (12)
- Diabolic Edict relevance 1.65 · 37.0% (20 of 54 decks)
- Sudden Edict relevance 1.18 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Sheoldred's Edict relevance 0.74 · 38.9% (21 of 54 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.54 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.47 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (15 of 54 decks)
- Soul Shatter relevance 0.44 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.39 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.35 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Tragic Slip relevance 0.34 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
All sorceries (14)
- Cruel Edict relevance 2.03 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Chainer's Edict relevance 1.71 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Coercion relevance 1.55 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Overwhelming Forces relevance 1.39 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.84 · 31.5% (17 of 54 decks)
- Myrkul's Edict relevance 0.81 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Ambition's Cost relevance 0.79 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (13 of 54 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.40 · 29.6% (16 of 54 decks)
- Bubbling Muck relevance 0.39 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.36 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.34 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Mutilate relevance 0.30 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.29 · 14.8% (8 of 54 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.54 · 16.7% (9 of 54 decks)
- Witch's Cottage relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (18 of 54 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.44 · 18.5% (10 of 54 decks)
- Castle Locthwain relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (12 of 54 decks)
All lands (1)
- Cabal Stronghold relevance 0.37 · 29.6% (16 of 54 decks)
EDH data for Imperial Edict: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 54 real decks.











































