Petting Zookeeper
Played in 66 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
2.9% Sultai
- Golgari 1,477 · 65.4%
- Five-Color 193 · 8.5%
- Gruul 167 · 7.4%
- Simic 163 · 7.2%
- Sultai 66 · 2.9%
- Other (14) 194 · 8.6%
All commanders (1)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.55 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thought Monitor relevance 2.65 · 40.9% (27 of 66 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 2.06 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.99 · 50.0% (33 of 66 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 1.97 · 65.2% (43 of 66 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 1.77 · 50.0% (33 of 66 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.71 · 48.5% (32 of 66 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 1.59 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 1.53 · 42.4% (28 of 66 decks)
- Blur relevance 1.39 · 27.3% (18 of 66 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.36 · 47.0% (31 of 66 decks)
- Displace relevance 1.36 · 30.3% (20 of 66 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 1.36 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Battle at the Bridge relevance 1.29 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 1.26 · 30.3% (20 of 66 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 1.17 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 1.07 · 25.8% (17 of 66 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 1.02 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.93 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.90 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.90 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.88 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.87 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.84 · 37.9% (25 of 66 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.82 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.70 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Thought Monitor relevance 2.65 · 40.9% (27 of 66 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 2.06 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 1.59 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 1.53 · 42.4% (28 of 66 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.36 · 47.0% (31 of 66 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 1.26 · 30.3% (20 of 66 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.93 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.90 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.87 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.84 · 37.9% (25 of 66 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.82 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 39.4% (26 of 66 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.58 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.48 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.99 · 50.0% (33 of 66 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 1.97 · 65.2% (43 of 66 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 1.17 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.90 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.57 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.55 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.53 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 1.07 · 25.8% (17 of 66 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 1.02 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
All instants (8)
- Saw in Half relevance 1.77 · 50.0% (33 of 66 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.71 · 48.5% (32 of 66 decks)
- Blur relevance 1.39 · 27.3% (18 of 66 decks)
- Displace relevance 1.36 · 30.3% (20 of 66 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 1.36 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.88 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.70 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.53 · 37.9% (25 of 66 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Battle at the Bridge relevance 1.29 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 1.29 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.76 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.55 · 39.4% (26 of 66 decks)
All lands (6)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 1.55 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 1.48 · 27.3% (18 of 66 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 1.39 · 25.8% (17 of 66 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.76 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Darkmoss Bridge relevance 0.60 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
EDH data for Petting Zookeeper: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 66 real decks.