Too Greedily, Too Deep
Played in 301 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Jund
-
Grixis 10,332 · 82.7%
-
Rakdos 1,433 · 11.5%
-
Jund 301 · 2.4%
- Other (8) 428 · 3.4%
630+27+1+4+4+6+6+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (6)
- Coram, the Undertaker relevance 1.83 · 1.4% (69 of 4,835 decks)
- The Muckslinger Gang relevance 1.42 · 1.3% (31 of 2,461 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.07 · 2.0% (8 of 403 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.59 · 2.6% (2 of 78 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.34 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.32 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.72 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Corpse Explosion relevance 0.70 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.70 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Ziatora, the Incinerator relevance 0.68 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.67 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.67 · 35.2% (106 of 301 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.66 · 18.6% (56 of 301 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.66 · 24.9% (75 of 301 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.65 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.64 · 31.6% (95 of 301 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (61 of 301 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.63 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Nibelheim Aflame relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Disciple of Bolas relevance 0.61 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Souls of the Lost relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.60 · 19.9% (60 of 301 decks)
- Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 0.60 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.57 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Splinterfright relevance 0.57 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Gravebreaker Lamia relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Mindwrack Harpy relevance 0.56 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.56 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Old Stickfingers relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- One Ring to Rule Them All relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.55 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.55 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Altar of the Wretched // Wretched Bonemass relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Ziatora, the Incinerator relevance 0.68 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.66 · 18.6% (56 of 301 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.66 · 24.9% (75 of 301 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.65 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.64 · 31.6% (95 of 301 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (61 of 301 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.62 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Disciple of Bolas relevance 0.61 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Souls of the Lost relevance 0.61 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.60 · 19.9% (60 of 301 decks)
- Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 0.60 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- The Balrog of Moria relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Splinterfright relevance 0.57 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Gravebreaker Lamia relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Mindwrack Harpy relevance 0.56 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.56 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Old Stickfingers relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.55 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.55 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Altar of the Wretched // Wretched Bonemass relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.54 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Chainer, Nightmare Adept relevance 0.53 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Nyx Weaver relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Feldon of the Third Path relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.50 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.50 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.52 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.72 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.67 · 35.2% (106 of 301 decks)
- One Ring to Rule Them All relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Rakdos Joins Up relevance 0.51 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
All instants (4)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.70 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.57 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.55 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Corpse Explosion relevance 0.70 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.67 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.63 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Nibelheim Aflame relevance 0.63 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.53 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.53 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.89 · 27.9% (84 of 301 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.72 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Kazuul's Fury // Kazuul's Cliffs relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.61 · 20.9% (63 of 301 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.61 · 29.6% (89 of 301 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.53 · 19.9% (60 of 301 decks)
All lands (2)
- Foreboding Ruins relevance 0.51 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
EDH data for Too Greedily, Too Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 301 real decks.




















































