Garruk's Horde
Played in 154 Bant decks
130+39+4+1+2+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Bant
Commanders
Most Relevant
Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty 30.5% of decks
Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty 30.5% of decks
Vizier of the Menagerie 22.7% of decks
Vizier of the Menagerie 22.7% of decks
Garruk's Uprising 38.3% of decks
Garruk's Uprising 38.3% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 28.6% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 28.6% of decks
Garruk's Packleader 16.2% of decks
Garruk's Packleader 16.2% of decks
Tatyova, Benthic Druid 28.6% of decks
Tatyova, Benthic Druid 28.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.47 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.09 · 30.5% (47 of 154 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 1.00 · 22.7% (35 of 154 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.98 · 38.3% (59 of 154 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.98 · 28.6% (44 of 154 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (25 of 154 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.79 · 28.6% (44 of 154 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.78 · 24.0% (37 of 154 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.74 · 18.8% (29 of 154 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.71 · 15.6% (24 of 154 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.68 · 27.9% (43 of 154 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (42 of 154 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.65 · 21.4% (33 of 154 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.64 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.64 · 22.7% (35 of 154 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.63 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.62 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (24 of 154 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.61 · 22.1% (34 of 154 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.59 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.58 · 13.0% (20 of 154 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (23 of 154 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.55 · 13.0% (20 of 154 decks)
- Ethereal Valkyrie relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (19 of 154 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (15 of 154 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (14 of 154 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (19 of 154 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.09 · 30.5% (47 of 154 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 1.00 · 22.7% (35 of 154 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.98 · 28.6% (44 of 154 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (25 of 154 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.79 · 28.6% (44 of 154 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.78 · 24.0% (37 of 154 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.74 · 18.8% (29 of 154 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.71 · 15.6% (24 of 154 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.68 · 27.9% (43 of 154 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (42 of 154 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.65 · 21.4% (33 of 154 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.64 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (31 of 154 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.64 · 22.7% (35 of 154 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.63 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 0.62 · 15.6% (24 of 154 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.61 · 22.1% (34 of 154 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (23 of 154 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.55 · 13.0% (20 of 154 decks)
- Ethereal Valkyrie relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (19 of 154 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.53 · 9.7% (15 of 154 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (14 of 154 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (19 of 154 decks)
- Vega, the Watcher relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (24 of 154 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (24 of 154 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (17 of 154 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (22 of 154 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (13 of 154 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (12 of 154 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (20 of 154 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (13 of 154 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (21 of 154 decks)
- Magus of the Future relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (12 of 154 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (17 of 154 decks)
- Sage of the Beyond relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.98 · 38.3% (59 of 154 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.62 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.58 · 13.0% (20 of 154 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.50 · 16.9% (26 of 154 decks)
All instants (1)
- Shore Up relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (20 of 154 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (18 of 154 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.49 · 13.6% (21 of 154 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.59 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.58 · 17.5% (27 of 154 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (28 of 154 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 34.4% (53 of 154 decks)
EDH data for Garruk's Horde: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 154 real decks.




























