Field Research
Played in 97 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
530+7+6+1+15+10+2+9+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Ezio, Blade of Vengeance relevance 0.99 · 1.1% (4 of 357 decks)
- Kang, Temporal Tyrant relevance 0.94 · 1.6% (3 of 187 decks)
- Sivitri Scarzam relevance 0.53 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.42 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
- Uchbenbak, the Great Mistake relevance 0.42 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.73 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.67 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.60 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.55 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Bladebrand relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Xande, Dark Mage relevance 0.51 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Sephiroth's Intervention relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Evil Reawakened relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.47 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Foggy Swamp Spirit Keeper relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.47 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.46 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Hero's Downfall relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.40 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.52 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Xande, Dark Mage relevance 0.51 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Foggy Swamp Spirit Keeper relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Locke Cole relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.60 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.40 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.37 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
All instants (15)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.73 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Murder relevance 0.67 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.55 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Bladebrand relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Sephiroth's Intervention relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Whoosh! relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.47 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.46 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.43 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Hero's Downfall relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Doom Blade relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Divination relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Evil Reawakened relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.47 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.36 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Eaten Alive relevance 0.35 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Pilfered Plans relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Serpent's Pass relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Sinister Hideout relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
All lands (9)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.83 · 42.3% (41 of 97 decks)
- Treno, Dark City relevance 0.78 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.61 · 30.9% (30 of 97 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.55 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.50 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Submerged Boneyard relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.37 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
EDH data for Field Research: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 97 real decks.























































