Sands of Delirium
Played in 98 Esper decks
130+13+10+2+9+10+5+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Fleet Swallower 36.7% of decks
Fleet Swallower 36.7% of decks
Riverchurn Monument 41.8% of decks
Riverchurn Monument 41.8% of decks
Drown in Dreams 36.7% of decks
Drown in Dreams 36.7% of decks
Fraying Sanity 37.8% of decks
Fraying Sanity 37.8% of decks
Traumatize 37.8% of decks
Traumatize 37.8% of decks
Terisian Mindbreaker 32.7% of decks
Terisian Mindbreaker 32.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Saruman of Many Colors relevance 2.43 · 1.1% (40 of 3,542 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 2.43 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 2.22 · 41.8% (41 of 98 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 2.09 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 2.06 · 37.8% (37 of 98 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 2.06 · 37.8% (37 of 98 decks)
- Terisian Mindbreaker relevance 1.98 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 1.98 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Space-Time Anomaly relevance 1.89 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Kitsune's Technique relevance 1.88 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Archive Trap relevance 1.88 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 1.88 · 41.8% (41 of 98 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 1.87 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 1.87 · 43.9% (43 of 98 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 1.87 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Divergent Equation relevance 1.86 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 1.85 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 1.81 · 31.6% (31 of 98 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 1.77 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Zuko's Conviction relevance 1.74 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 1.69 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Unravel relevance 1.66 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 1.57 · 43.9% (43 of 98 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 1.54 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 1.44 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.40 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 1.39 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Mirko Vosk, Mind Drinker relevance 1.36 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.36 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 1.32 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 1.31 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 2.43 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Terisian Mindbreaker relevance 1.98 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 1.98 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 1.87 · 43.9% (43 of 98 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 1.87 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 1.77 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 1.40 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Mirko Vosk, Mind Drinker relevance 1.36 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Sphinx Mindbreaker relevance 1.28 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
- The Cyber-Controller relevance 1.23 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 1.19 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 1.19 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Hanna, Ship's Navigator relevance 0.99 · 23.5% (23 of 98 decks)
All artifacts (10)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 2.22 · 41.8% (41 of 98 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 1.88 · 41.8% (41 of 98 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 1.57 · 43.9% (43 of 98 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 1.54 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 1.44 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 1.39 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 1.31 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 1.20 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 1.09 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 1.05 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 2.06 · 37.8% (37 of 98 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 1.13 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
All instants (9)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 2.09 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Kitsune's Technique relevance 1.88 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Archive Trap relevance 1.88 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Divergent Equation relevance 1.86 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Zuko's Conviction relevance 1.74 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Unravel relevance 1.66 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.36 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 1.32 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Absorb relevance 1.17 · 31.6% (31 of 98 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Traumatize relevance 2.06 · 37.8% (37 of 98 decks)
- Space-Time Anomaly relevance 1.89 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 1.87 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 1.85 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 1.81 · 31.6% (31 of 98 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 1.69 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 1.16 · 37.8% (37 of 98 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 1.16 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.94 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.93 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 1.67 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Sejiri Refuge relevance 1.36 · 28.6% (28 of 98 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 1.05 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.92 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.92 · 30.6% (30 of 98 decks)
All lands (1)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.92 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
EDH data for Sands of Delirium: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 98 real decks.














































