Soot Imp
Played in 262 Dimir decks
230+14+1+4+18+10+3+
Color Identity Spread
7.6% Dimir
-
Rakdos 2,099 · 61.0%
-
Black 875 · 25.4%
-
Dimir 262 · 7.6%
-
Orzhov 101 · 2.9%
- Other (12) 105 · 3.1%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Rug of Smothering 70.2% of decks
Rug of Smothering 70.2% of decks
Cryptolith Fragment // Aurora of Emrakul 59.2% of decks
Cryptolith Fragment // Aurora of Emrakul 59.2% of decks
Neerdiv, Devious Diver 50.8% of decks
Neerdiv, Devious Diver 50.8% of decks
Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian 57.3% of decks
Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian 57.3% of decks
Blood Seeker 40.1% of decks
Blood Seeker 40.1% of decks
Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator 67.2% of decks
Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator 67.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 4.78 · 14.1% (195 of 1,386 decks)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 2.66 · 4.1% (50 of 1,214 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 3.94 · 70.2% (184 of 262 decks)
- Cryptolith Fragment // Aurora of Emrakul relevance 3.32 · 59.2% (155 of 262 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 2.37 · 50.8% (133 of 262 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 2.36 · 57.3% (150 of 262 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 2.31 · 40.1% (105 of 262 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 2.18 · 67.2% (176 of 262 decks)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 2.17 · 56.5% (148 of 262 decks)
- Fang, Fearless l'Cie relevance 2.12 · 36.3% (95 of 262 decks)
- Teval's Judgment relevance 2.08 · 50.0% (131 of 262 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.08 · 41.2% (108 of 262 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 2.07 · 49.6% (130 of 262 decks)
- Unwind relevance 1.83 · 54.6% (143 of 262 decks)
- Rewind relevance 1.82 · 51.5% (135 of 262 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 1.76 · 34.7% (91 of 262 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 1.73 · 33.6% (88 of 262 decks)
- Diresight relevance 1.69 · 42.0% (110 of 262 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.66 · 28.6% (75 of 262 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 1.56 · 32.4% (85 of 262 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 1.54 · 55.3% (145 of 262 decks)
- Eat to Extinction relevance 1.52 · 25.2% (66 of 262 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.51 · 44.7% (117 of 262 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 1.51 · 35.5% (93 of 262 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 1.50 · 32.1% (84 of 262 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 1.50 · 27.9% (73 of 262 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 1.48 · 28.6% (75 of 262 decks)
- Swallowed by Leviathan relevance 1.47 · 35.5% (93 of 262 decks)
- Shepherd of Rot relevance 1.44 · 36.6% (96 of 262 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 1.43 · 36.6% (96 of 262 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.43 · 32.4% (85 of 262 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.41 · 30.5% (80 of 262 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Rug of Smothering relevance 3.94 · 70.2% (184 of 262 decks)
- Cryptolith Fragment // Aurora of Emrakul relevance 3.32 · 59.2% (155 of 262 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 2.37 · 50.8% (133 of 262 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 2.36 · 57.3% (150 of 262 decks)
- Blood Seeker relevance 2.31 · 40.1% (105 of 262 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 2.18 · 67.2% (176 of 262 decks)
- Fang, Fearless l'Cie relevance 2.12 · 36.3% (95 of 262 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 1.73 · 33.6% (88 of 262 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 1.50 · 32.1% (84 of 262 decks)
- Fate Unraveler relevance 1.50 · 27.9% (73 of 262 decks)
- Shepherd of Rot relevance 1.44 · 36.6% (96 of 262 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 1.43 · 36.6% (96 of 262 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 1.40 · 45.0% (118 of 262 decks)
- Mai, Scornful Striker relevance 1.22 · 22.9% (60 of 262 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 1.54 · 55.3% (145 of 262 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 2.17 · 56.5% (148 of 262 decks)
- Teval's Judgment relevance 2.08 · 50.0% (131 of 262 decks)
- Underworld Dreams relevance 1.32 · 27.5% (72 of 262 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 1.24 · 38.9% (102 of 262 decks)
All instants (18)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 2.08 · 41.2% (108 of 262 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 2.07 · 49.6% (130 of 262 decks)
- Unwind relevance 1.83 · 54.6% (143 of 262 decks)
- Rewind relevance 1.82 · 51.5% (135 of 262 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.66 · 28.6% (75 of 262 decks)
- Eat to Extinction relevance 1.52 · 25.2% (66 of 262 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 1.51 · 35.5% (93 of 262 decks)
- Swallowed by Leviathan relevance 1.47 · 35.5% (93 of 262 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.43 · 32.4% (85 of 262 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.41 · 30.5% (80 of 262 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 1.38 · 29.8% (78 of 262 decks)
- Cruel Truths relevance 1.38 · 23.7% (62 of 262 decks)
- Transpose relevance 1.28 · 23.7% (62 of 262 decks)
- Overkill relevance 1.26 · 32.1% (84 of 262 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.23 · 22.9% (60 of 262 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 1.21 · 21.8% (57 of 262 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 1.20 · 23.7% (62 of 262 decks)
- Ephara's Dispersal relevance 1.18 · 27.9% (73 of 262 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 1.76 · 34.7% (91 of 262 decks)
- Diresight relevance 1.69 · 42.0% (110 of 262 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 1.56 · 32.4% (85 of 262 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.51 · 44.7% (117 of 262 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 1.48 · 28.6% (75 of 262 decks)
- Start the TARDIS relevance 1.40 · 24.4% (64 of 262 decks)
- Risky Research relevance 1.37 · 29.0% (76 of 262 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 1.35 · 26.3% (69 of 262 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.31 · 27.5% (72 of 262 decks)
- Candlekeep Inspiration relevance 1.26 · 23.3% (61 of 262 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Leechridden Swamp relevance 3.00 · 58.4% (153 of 262 decks)
- Piranha Marsh relevance 1.69 · 24.8% (65 of 262 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 1.42 · 37.4% (98 of 262 decks)
EDH data for Soot Imp: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 262 real decks.

















































