Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner
Played in 647 Orzhov decks
Color Identity Spread
59.0% Orzhov
- Orzhov 647 · 59.0%
- Abzan 182 · 16.6%
- Five-Color 98 · 8.9%
- Mardu 93 · 8.5%
- Esper 44 · 4.0%
- Other (13) 33 · 3.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (16)
- Abigale, Eloquent First-Year relevance 4.21 · 10.8% (406 of 3,773 decks)
- Vito, Fanatic of Aclazotz relevance 1.32 · 3.1% (15 of 490 decks)
- Neva, Stalked by Nightmares relevance 1.01 · 2.8% (8 of 282 decks)
- Denethor, Ruling Steward relevance 0.86 · 3.1% (5 of 160 decks)
- Haunted One // Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody relevance 0.83 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Baron Bertram Graywater relevance 0.65 · 2.0% (4 of 202 decks)
- Hildibrand Manderville // Gentleman's Rise relevance 0.64 · 1.3% (6 of 477 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer // Far Traveler relevance 0.62 · 5.1% (2 of 39 decks)
- Alharu, Solemn Ritualist // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Judge Magister Gabranth relevance 0.59 · 1.3% (5 of 396 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Flaming Fist relevance 0.54 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 0.52 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Cultist of the Absolute // Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant relevance 0.44 · 1.9% (2 of 104 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne // Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Arvad the Cursed relevance 0.22 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Wernog, Rider's Chaplain relevance 0.21 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 2.49 · 56.6% (366 of 647 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 2.47 · 55.3% (358 of 647 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 2.42 · 53.6% (347 of 647 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 2.39 · 51.8% (335 of 647 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 2.37 · 51.9% (336 of 647 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.33 · 49.3% (319 of 647 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 2.24 · 46.7% (302 of 647 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 2.22 · 51.0% (330 of 647 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.20 · 46.7% (302 of 647 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 2.12 · 42.0% (272 of 647 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.06 · 42.3% (274 of 647 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 2.02 · 39.9% (258 of 647 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 1.99 · 46.8% (303 of 647 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 1.94 · 44.7% (289 of 647 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 1.92 · 36.2% (234 of 647 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 1.91 · 41.4% (268 of 647 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 1.80 · 39.6% (256 of 647 decks)
- Waning Wurm relevance 1.77 · 35.5% (230 of 647 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.57 · 34.9% (226 of 647 decks)
- Personify relevance 1.48 · 39.4% (255 of 647 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.43 · 42.7% (276 of 647 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.42 · 50.5% (327 of 647 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.38 · 25.7% (166 of 647 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 1.35 · 24.9% (161 of 647 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 1.33 · 37.7% (244 of 647 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.33 · 33.1% (214 of 647 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 1.32 · 42.0% (272 of 647 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.25 · 34.8% (225 of 647 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 1.20 · 36.2% (234 of 647 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.18 · 26.4% (171 of 647 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 2.49 · 56.6% (366 of 647 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 2.47 · 55.3% (358 of 647 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 2.42 · 53.6% (347 of 647 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 2.39 · 51.8% (335 of 647 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 2.37 · 51.9% (336 of 647 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.33 · 49.3% (319 of 647 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 2.24 · 46.7% (302 of 647 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 2.22 · 51.0% (330 of 647 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.20 · 46.7% (302 of 647 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 2.12 · 42.0% (272 of 647 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.06 · 42.3% (274 of 647 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 2.02 · 39.9% (258 of 647 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 1.99 · 46.8% (303 of 647 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 1.94 · 44.7% (289 of 647 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 1.92 · 36.2% (234 of 647 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 1.91 · 41.4% (268 of 647 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 1.80 · 39.6% (256 of 647 decks)
- Waning Wurm relevance 1.77 · 35.5% (230 of 647 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.57 · 34.9% (226 of 647 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.38 · 25.7% (166 of 647 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 1.35 · 24.9% (161 of 647 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 1.33 · 37.7% (244 of 647 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 1.20 · 36.2% (234 of 647 decks)
- Gilraen, Dúnedain Protector relevance 1.12 · 27.4% (177 of 647 decks)
- Alms Beast relevance 1.12 · 17.0% (110 of 647 decks)
- Disciple of Bolas relevance 1.09 · 28.7% (186 of 647 decks)
- Yathan Tombguard relevance 1.07 · 26.0% (168 of 647 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 1.04 · 26.3% (170 of 647 decks)
- Clackbridge Troll relevance 1.04 · 22.4% (145 of 647 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 1.04 · 17.6% (114 of 647 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (190 of 647 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 0.94 · 16.2% (105 of 647 decks)
- Eldrazi Displacer relevance 0.84 · 17.6% (114 of 647 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 0.82 · 24.6% (159 of 647 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.14 · 35.5% (230 of 647 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.33 · 33.1% (214 of 647 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.25 · 34.8% (225 of 647 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.97 · 32.0% (207 of 647 decks)
All instants (12)
- Personify relevance 1.48 · 39.4% (255 of 647 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.43 · 42.7% (276 of 647 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.42 · 50.5% (327 of 647 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 1.32 · 42.0% (272 of 647 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.18 · 26.4% (171 of 647 decks)
- Slip On the Ring relevance 1.12 · 28.0% (181 of 647 decks)
- Getaway Glamer relevance 1.10 · 26.1% (169 of 647 decks)
- Otherworldly Journey relevance 1.00 · 21.0% (136 of 647 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.99 · 37.2% (241 of 647 decks)
- Long Road Home relevance 0.98 · 18.4% (119 of 647 decks)
- Scrollshift relevance 0.96 · 22.7% (147 of 647 decks)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 0.95 · 21.8% (141 of 647 decks)
EDH data for Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 647 real decks.