Barkweave Crusher
Played in 264 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (9)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 1.44 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Haunted One // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 1.43 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 1.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.94 · 1.0% (3 of 290 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.70 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.61 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.54 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.49 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All parallel cards (5)
All most relevant (30)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 1.06 · 12.9% (34 of 264 decks)
- Hexbane Tortoise relevance 0.98 · 10.6% (28 of 264 decks)
- Linebreaker Baloth relevance 0.94 · 9.8% (26 of 264 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.90 · 15.2% (40 of 264 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.89 · 11.7% (31 of 264 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.82 · 11.4% (30 of 264 decks)
- Healer of the Glade relevance 0.81 · 9.1% (24 of 264 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.80 · 14.4% (38 of 264 decks)
- Coalition Warbrute relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (20 of 264 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (27 of 264 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 0.66 · 8.3% (22 of 264 decks)
- Conifer Strider relevance 0.65 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 0.61 · 7.6% (20 of 264 decks)
- Glade Watcher relevance 0.61 · 5.7% (15 of 264 decks)
- Frost Lynx relevance 0.61 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Gaea's Revenge relevance 0.59 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Living Totem relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Arboretum Elemental relevance 0.59 · 6.4% (17 of 264 decks)
- Magnigoth Sentry relevance 0.58 · 6.4% (17 of 264 decks)
- Walker of the Grove relevance 0.58 · 6.8% (18 of 264 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.57 · 8.0% (21 of 264 decks)
- Territorial Maro relevance 0.57 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Bloodbriar relevance 0.56 · 6.8% (18 of 264 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (28 of 264 decks)
- Air-Cult Elemental relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 0.54 · 6.4% (17 of 264 decks)
- Aquatic Alchemist // Bubble Up relevance 0.53 · 6.8% (18 of 264 decks)
- Balduvian Berserker relevance 0.52 · 5.7% (15 of 264 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (22 of 264 decks)
- Barishi relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (14 of 264 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 1.06 · 12.9% (34 of 264 decks)
- Hexbane Tortoise relevance 0.98 · 10.6% (28 of 264 decks)
- Linebreaker Baloth relevance 0.94 · 9.8% (26 of 264 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.90 · 15.2% (40 of 264 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.89 · 11.7% (31 of 264 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.82 · 11.4% (30 of 264 decks)
- Healer of the Glade relevance 0.81 · 9.1% (24 of 264 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.80 · 14.4% (38 of 264 decks)
- Coalition Warbrute relevance 0.67 · 7.6% (20 of 264 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (27 of 264 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 0.66 · 8.3% (22 of 264 decks)
- Conifer Strider relevance 0.65 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 0.61 · 7.6% (20 of 264 decks)
- Glade Watcher relevance 0.61 · 5.7% (15 of 264 decks)
- Frost Lynx relevance 0.61 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Gaea's Revenge relevance 0.59 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Living Totem relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Arboretum Elemental relevance 0.59 · 6.4% (17 of 264 decks)
- Magnigoth Sentry relevance 0.58 · 6.4% (17 of 264 decks)
- Walker of the Grove relevance 0.58 · 6.8% (18 of 264 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.57 · 8.0% (21 of 264 decks)
- Territorial Maro relevance 0.57 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Bloodbriar relevance 0.56 · 6.8% (18 of 264 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (28 of 264 decks)
- Air-Cult Elemental relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 0.54 · 6.4% (17 of 264 decks)
- Aquatic Alchemist // Bubble Up relevance 0.53 · 6.8% (18 of 264 decks)
- Balduvian Berserker relevance 0.52 · 5.7% (15 of 264 decks)
- Barishi relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (14 of 264 decks)
- Blighted Blackthorn relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Creeperhulk relevance 0.50 · 5.7% (15 of 264 decks)
- Gaea's Protector relevance 0.50 · 4.9% (13 of 264 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.50 · 7.6% (20 of 264 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (19 of 264 decks)
- Briarhorn relevance 0.48 · 5.7% (15 of 264 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (24 of 264 decks)
- Glimmerbell relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (14 of 264 decks)
- Chlorophant relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (12 of 264 decks)
- Brambleweft Behemoth relevance 0.47 · 4.9% (13 of 264 decks)
- Chillbringer relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (13 of 264 decks)
- Boreal Elemental relevance 0.46 · 4.5% (12 of 264 decks)
- Blazing Bomb relevance 0.46 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (26 of 264 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.46 · 6.1% (16 of 264 decks)
- Bramblesnap relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (12 of 264 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (14 of 264 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (22 of 264 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.45 · 25.8% (68 of 264 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.54 · 31.4% (83 of 264 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (29 of 264 decks)
EDH data for Barkweave Crusher: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 264 real decks.