Wall of Nets
Played in 125 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
3.2% Azorius
- Bant 1,719 · 44.7%
- Abzan 1,119 · 29.1%
- White 370 · 9.6%
- Jeskai 207 · 5.4%
- Azorius 125 · 3.2%
- Other (11) 308 · 8.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (6)
- Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer relevance 1.37 · 1.8% (8 of 435 decks)
- Ayesha Tanaka relevance 0.93 · 2.4% (3 of 126 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.66 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.55 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.37 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.36 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.55 · 56.0% (70 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.34 · 42.4% (53 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 2.01 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.90 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.86 · 45.6% (57 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.78 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.78 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.77 · 28.8% (36 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.70 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.67 · 41.6% (52 of 125 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.66 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.57 · 33.6% (42 of 125 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.49 · 29.6% (37 of 125 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.48 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.29 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.21 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.18 · 44.0% (55 of 125 decks)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 1.13 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 1.11 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 1.10 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 1.09 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Retribution of the Meek relevance 1.07 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Ward of Bones relevance 1.06 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.04 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.03 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 1.03 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 1.01 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.55 · 56.0% (70 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.34 · 42.4% (53 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 2.01 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.90 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.86 · 45.6% (57 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.78 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.78 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.77 · 28.8% (36 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.70 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.67 · 41.6% (52 of 125 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.66 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.57 · 33.6% (42 of 125 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.48 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.29 · 26.4% (33 of 125 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.26 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.21 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.18 · 44.0% (55 of 125 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 1.11 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 1.01 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.97 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.97 · 24.0% (30 of 125 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 0.96 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- The Fall of Lord Konda // Fragment of Konda relevance 0.96 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Baldin, Century Herdmaster relevance 0.95 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Wall of Reverence relevance 0.94 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Wharf Infiltrator relevance 0.92 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 0.92 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.91 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.91 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Ward of Bones relevance 1.06 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.03 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.97 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- High Alert relevance 1.49 · 29.6% (37 of 125 decks)
- Stoneskin relevance 1.10 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Web of Inertia relevance 1.09 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- The Birth of Meletis relevance 0.93 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Worship relevance 0.92 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.92 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Retribution of the Meek relevance 1.07 · 16.0% (20 of 125 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.04 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 1.03 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Wave of Reckoning relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.97 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.93 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- What Must Be Done relevance 0.92 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 1.13 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.93 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
All lands (1)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Nets: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 125 real decks.