Voidmage Husher
Played in 89 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
330+31+2+5+9+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 3.11 · 4.2% (34 of 808 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 1.55 · 1.7% (8 of 470 decks)
- Wydwen, the Biting Gale relevance 0.86 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cunning Nightbonder relevance 2.38 · 55.1% (49 of 89 decks)
- Slitherwisp relevance 2.25 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 1.94 · 32.6% (29 of 89 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 1.88 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 1.83 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 1.76 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Rewind relevance 1.74 · 49.4% (44 of 89 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 1.68 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 1.65 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 1.53 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.48 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Unwind relevance 1.47 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 1.29 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Omen of the Dead relevance 1.24 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Mystical Teachings relevance 1.23 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 1.21 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 1.19 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Faerie Tauntings relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 1.09 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 1.09 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 1.01 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 1.00 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.99 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.96 · 33.7% (30 of 89 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.91 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.86 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Overcharged Amalgam relevance 0.86 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.84 · 44.9% (40 of 89 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.83 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.83 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Cunning Nightbonder relevance 2.38 · 55.1% (49 of 89 decks)
- Slitherwisp relevance 2.25 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Portal Mage relevance 1.94 · 32.6% (29 of 89 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 1.88 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 1.83 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Brineborn Cutthroat relevance 1.76 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 1.68 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 1.65 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Voracious Greatshark relevance 1.53 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 1.48 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 1.29 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 1.21 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Stinging Lionfish relevance 1.09 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 1.09 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 1.01 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 1.00 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.96 · 33.7% (30 of 89 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.91 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Overcharged Amalgam relevance 0.86 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.84 · 44.9% (40 of 89 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.83 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.83 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.80 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.79 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Quickling relevance 0.78 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Lochmere Serpent relevance 0.74 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.74 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.75 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.72 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Omen of the Dead relevance 1.24 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 1.19 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Faerie Tauntings relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.86 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.70 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
All instants (9)
- Rewind relevance 1.74 · 49.4% (44 of 89 decks)
- Unwind relevance 1.47 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Mystical Teachings relevance 1.23 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.99 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.80 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.79 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.77 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.72 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.68 · 29.2% (26 of 89 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.85 · 38.2% (34 of 89 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.74 · 29.2% (26 of 89 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
EDH data for Voidmage Husher: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 89 real decks.









































