Squall Line
Played in 102 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Sultai
- Green 2,029 · 48.8%
- Selesnya 685 · 16.5%
- Simic 474 · 11.4%
- Golgari 341 · 8.2%
- Gruul 200 · 4.8%
- Sultai 102 · 2.5%
- Other (10) 325 · 7.8%
All most relevant (30)
- Hurricane relevance 2.10 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 1.88 · 63.7% (65 of 102 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 1.74 · 54.9% (56 of 102 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.64 · 40.2% (41 of 102 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.64 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.62 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 1.50 · 40.2% (41 of 102 decks)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.48 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.45 · 54.9% (56 of 102 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.45 · 43.1% (44 of 102 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 1.34 · 33.3% (34 of 102 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.33 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.33 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.29 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.29 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.28 · 59.8% (61 of 102 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 1.25 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.18 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.17 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.16 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Nexos relevance 1.15 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.14 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.14 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.13 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.13 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (36 of 102 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.07 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Suffer the Past relevance 1.07 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 1.06 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.04 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 1.88 · 63.7% (65 of 102 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 1.33 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.29 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 1.17 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Nexos relevance 1.15 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.14 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 1.13 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (36 of 102 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.07 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 1.06 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.04 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Altered Ego relevance 1.00 · 25.5% (26 of 102 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 0.97 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.94 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.94 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Elementalist's Palette relevance 1.48 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 1.74 · 54.9% (56 of 102 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.97 · 35.3% (36 of 102 decks)
- Mana Bloom relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.93 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
All instants (18)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 1.64 · 40.2% (41 of 102 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.64 · 39.2% (40 of 102 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 1.62 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 1.34 · 33.3% (34 of 102 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 1.29 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 1.25 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 1.18 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 1.16 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Suffer the Past relevance 1.07 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 1.03 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 0.99 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Logic Knot relevance 0.95 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.93 · 29.4% (30 of 102 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.92 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.91 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.91 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Black Sun's Twilight relevance 0.90 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.89 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Hurricane relevance 2.10 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 1.50 · 40.2% (41 of 102 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.45 · 54.9% (56 of 102 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.45 · 43.1% (44 of 102 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.33 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 1.28 · 59.8% (61 of 102 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.14 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.13 · 38.2% (39 of 102 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 1.03 · 24.5% (25 of 102 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 1.02 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 1.00 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.99 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
EDH data for Squall Line: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 102 real decks.