Miraculous Recovery
Played in 80 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 1.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.83 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.72 · 1.1% (2 of 188 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.45 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.03 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 1.01 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.98 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Lightning Helix relevance 0.98 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.92 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.92 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Woolly Thoctar relevance 0.90 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Loam Lion relevance 0.90 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Ajani Vengeant relevance 0.90 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.87 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Late to Dinner relevance 0.85 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.83 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.81 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Battle Mastery relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Wild Nacatl relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.69 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Marisi's Twinclaws relevance 0.67 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Fleetfoot Panther relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Pyroclasm relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 0.55 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.44 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.98 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.92 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.90 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Woolly Thoctar relevance 0.90 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Loam Lion relevance 0.90 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 0.72 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Wild Nacatl relevance 0.71 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Marisi's Twinclaws relevance 0.67 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Fleetfoot Panther relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Ajani's Pridemate relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.44 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.81 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Battle Mastery relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All instants (9)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 1.01 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Lightning Helix relevance 0.98 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.92 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Pyrokinesis relevance 0.83 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.69 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.35 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.03 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.87 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Late to Dinner relevance 0.85 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Pyroclasm relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 0.55 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Ajani Vengeant relevance 0.90 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 1.04 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 1.03 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.88 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.87 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Vitu-Ghazi, the City-Tree relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
All lands (10)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.86 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.59 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.33 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
EDH data for Miraculous Recovery: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 80 real decks.