Fortified Area
Played in 88 White decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (13)
- Invisible Woman, Sue Storm relevance 2.48 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Ghalta the Immovable relevance 2.11 · 2.2% (18 of 823 decks)
- General Jarkeld relevance 1.59 · 5.4% (5 of 92 decks)
- Soraya the Falconer relevance 1.30 · 1.3% (7 of 536 decks)
- Hazduhr the Abbot relevance 1.03 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Doctor Spectrum relevance 0.78 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.64 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.62 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Hakoda, Selfless Commander relevance 0.51 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Rasaad yn Bashir // Flaming Fist relevance 0.45 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Radiant, Serra Archangel // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.42 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Cho-Manno, Revolutionary relevance 0.42 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Baird, Steward of Argive relevance 0.41 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Glare relevance 2.11 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Rolling Stones relevance 2.05 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 2.02 · 53.4% (47 of 88 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.93 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Hope relevance 1.90 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 1.88 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Nets relevance 1.88 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.85 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.80 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.79 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Cooperation relevance 1.75 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Essence relevance 1.74 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Shield Bearer relevance 1.67 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 1.67 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 1.67 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 1.67 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.64 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Formation relevance 1.58 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.58 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 1.58 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.49 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.48 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.43 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Steel Wall relevance 1.43 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Mesa Pegasus relevance 1.41 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Knight relevance 1.40 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Wall Off relevance 1.39 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 1.37 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.27 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Wall of Glare relevance 2.11 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 2.02 · 53.4% (47 of 88 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.93 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Hope relevance 1.90 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Nets relevance 1.88 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.85 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.80 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.79 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Essence relevance 1.74 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Shield Bearer relevance 1.67 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 1.67 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 1.67 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 1.67 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.64 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.58 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 1.58 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.48 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.43 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Steel Wall relevance 1.43 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Mesa Pegasus relevance 1.41 · 23.9% (21 of 88 decks)
- Kjeldoran Knight relevance 1.40 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 1.37 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.27 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Benalish Infantry relevance 1.27 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 1.25 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.23 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.23 · 21.6% (19 of 88 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 1.23 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 1.14 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Clockwork Drawbridge relevance 1.12 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Consulate Skygate relevance 1.11 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.10 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Escarpment Fortress relevance 1.08 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Gleaming Barrier relevance 1.05 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 1.03 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Teremko Griffin relevance 1.02 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 1.01 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 0.96 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Cathedral Membrane relevance 0.92 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Baton of Morale relevance 1.88 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.49 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Rolling Stones relevance 2.05 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Cooperation relevance 1.75 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Builder's Talent relevance 0.98 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.97 · 33.0% (29 of 88 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 0.90 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cathedral of Serra relevance 1.19 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
EDH data for Fortified Area: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 88 real decks.