Everbark Shaman
Played in 48 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Selesnya
-
Abzan 1,038 · 53.6%
-
Green 716 · 37.0%
-
Golgari 74 · 3.8%
-
Selesnya 48 · 2.5%
- Other (10) 61 · 3.1%
130+34+2+4+4+4+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Treebeard, Gracious Host relevance 3.21 · 2.6% (43 of 1,682 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 5.09 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 4.71 · 72.9% (35 of 48 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 4.63 · 85.4% (41 of 48 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 4.05 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 3.93 · 66.7% (32 of 48 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 3.68 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 3.63 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 3.48 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 3.26 · 66.7% (32 of 48 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 3.19 · 68.8% (33 of 48 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 2.94 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 2.78 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 2.77 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 2.67 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 2.45 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 2.31 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 2.30 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 2.09 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 1.92 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.83 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Lumberknot relevance 1.81 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.80 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 1.79 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 1.75 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Lignify relevance 1.69 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 1.67 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 1.60 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 1.58 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Sam, Loyal Attendant relevance 1.57 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 1.53 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 5.09 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 4.71 · 72.9% (35 of 48 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 4.63 · 85.4% (41 of 48 decks)
- Ezzaroot Channeler relevance 4.05 · 79.2% (38 of 48 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 3.93 · 66.7% (32 of 48 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 3.68 · 54.2% (26 of 48 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 3.63 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 3.48 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 3.26 · 66.7% (32 of 48 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 3.19 · 68.8% (33 of 48 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 2.94 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 2.77 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 2.67 · 58.3% (28 of 48 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 2.45 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Shriekwood Devourer relevance 2.31 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Wildwood Mentor relevance 2.30 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Moonlit Lamenter relevance 2.09 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 1.92 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Lumberknot relevance 1.81 · 27.1% (13 of 48 decks)
- Kurbis, Harvest Celebrant relevance 1.79 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Ferrafor, Young Yew relevance 1.75 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 1.67 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 1.60 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Sam, Loyal Attendant relevance 1.57 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.39 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- The Gaffer relevance 1.38 · 45.8% (22 of 48 decks)
- Samwise Gamgee relevance 1.27 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
- Farmer Cotton relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Ironroot Warlord relevance 1.14 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 1.13 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 1.08 · 33.3% (16 of 48 decks)
- Elanor Gardner relevance 1.06 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
- Six relevance 1.04 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Rosie Cotton of South Lane relevance 0.87 · 31.3% (15 of 48 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Lembas relevance 0.98 · 18.8% (9 of 48 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.92 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 2.78 · 60.4% (29 of 48 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.80 · 39.6% (19 of 48 decks)
- Lignify relevance 1.69 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 0.92 · 16.7% (8 of 48 decks)
All instants (4)
- Entish Restoration relevance 1.58 · 41.7% (20 of 48 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 1.11 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
- Predator's Rapport relevance 1.07 · 20.8% (10 of 48 decks)
- Feed the Clan relevance 1.05 · 22.9% (11 of 48 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.83 · 43.8% (21 of 48 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 1.53 · 29.2% (14 of 48 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 1.52 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 1.37 · 35.4% (17 of 48 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- The Shire relevance 1.62 · 50.0% (24 of 48 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 1.06 · 25.0% (12 of 48 decks)
EDH data for Everbark Shaman: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 48 real decks.





































