Select for Inspection
Played in 232 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
13.2% Dimir
All commanders (2)
- Etrata, the Silencer relevance 2.85 · 4.6% (53 of 1,143 decks)
- Ghost, Spectral Saboteur relevance 0.36 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sage Owl relevance 1.46 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 1.42 · 37.1% (86 of 232 decks)
- Dimir Infiltrator relevance 1.32 · 43.1% (100 of 232 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 1.29 · 29.3% (68 of 232 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 1.16 · 42.7% (99 of 232 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 1.16 · 26.7% (62 of 232 decks)
- Rags // Riches relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (58 of 232 decks)
- Far // Away relevance 1.14 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.13 · 43.1% (100 of 232 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 1.12 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Tormented Soul relevance 1.10 · 38.4% (89 of 232 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.09 · 40.9% (95 of 232 decks)
- Okiba-Gang Shinobi relevance 1.08 · 24.6% (57 of 232 decks)
- Portent relevance 1.07 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 1.05 · 46.6% (108 of 232 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 1.02 · 43.5% (101 of 232 decks)
- Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.98 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Skullsnatcher relevance 0.97 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.97 · 19.8% (46 of 232 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.96 · 25.4% (59 of 232 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.93 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Walker of Secret Ways relevance 0.93 · 22.4% (52 of 232 decks)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.91 · 35.8% (83 of 232 decks)
- Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.90 · 23.7% (55 of 232 decks)
- Consign // Oblivion relevance 0.90 · 23.7% (55 of 232 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.90 · 36.6% (85 of 232 decks)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.90 · 24.1% (56 of 232 decks)
- Signal Pest relevance 0.90 · 18.1% (42 of 232 decks)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.87 · 22.4% (52 of 232 decks)
- Rescue relevance 0.87 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Sage Owl relevance 1.46 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Dimir Infiltrator relevance 1.32 · 43.1% (100 of 232 decks)
- Ninja of the Deep Hours relevance 1.16 · 42.7% (99 of 232 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.13 · 43.1% (100 of 232 decks)
- Tormented Soul relevance 1.10 · 38.4% (89 of 232 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 1.09 · 40.9% (95 of 232 decks)
- Okiba-Gang Shinobi relevance 1.08 · 24.6% (57 of 232 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 1.05 · 46.6% (108 of 232 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 1.02 · 43.5% (101 of 232 decks)
- Silent-Blade Oni relevance 0.98 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Skullsnatcher relevance 0.97 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Walker of Secret Ways relevance 0.93 · 22.4% (52 of 232 decks)
- Ingenious Infiltrator relevance 0.91 · 35.8% (83 of 232 decks)
- Triton Shorestalker relevance 0.90 · 36.6% (85 of 232 decks)
- Signal Pest relevance 0.90 · 18.1% (42 of 232 decks)
- Gudul Lurker relevance 0.87 · 25.9% (60 of 232 decks)
- Azra Smokeshaper relevance 0.86 · 19.0% (44 of 232 decks)
- Spire Owl relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (30 of 232 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.83 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.83 · 15.5% (36 of 232 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.80 · 33.6% (78 of 232 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.80 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Mist-Cloaked Herald relevance 0.78 · 27.6% (64 of 232 decks)
- Vodalian Illusionist relevance 0.77 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
- Moonblade Shinobi relevance 0.75 · 19.0% (44 of 232 decks)
- Hypnotic Siren relevance 0.74 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.87 · 22.4% (52 of 232 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (33 of 232 decks)
All instants (10)
- Unsummon relevance 1.42 · 37.1% (86 of 232 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 1.29 · 29.3% (68 of 232 decks)
- Far // Away relevance 1.14 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 1.12 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.97 · 19.8% (46 of 232 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.96 · 25.4% (59 of 232 decks)
- Discovery // Dispersal relevance 0.90 · 23.7% (55 of 232 decks)
- Consign // Oblivion relevance 0.90 · 23.7% (55 of 232 decks)
- Rescue relevance 0.87 · 13.8% (32 of 232 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.82 · 15.9% (37 of 232 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Devastation Tide relevance 1.16 · 26.7% (62 of 232 decks)
- Rags // Riches relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (58 of 232 decks)
- Portent relevance 1.07 · 27.2% (63 of 232 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.93 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Connive // Concoct relevance 0.90 · 24.1% (56 of 232 decks)
- Never // Return relevance 0.80 · 15.5% (36 of 232 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.78 · 16.8% (39 of 232 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kaito, Dancing Shadow relevance 0.80 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.88 · 31.0% (72 of 232 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.80 · 12.1% (28 of 232 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.88 · 44.8% (104 of 232 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.74 · 31.5% (73 of 232 decks)
EDH data for Select for Inspection: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 232 real decks.