Refuse to Yield
Played in 159 Bant decks
130+34+3+4+3+3+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
3.5% Bant
Commanders
Most Relevant
Stoneskin 56.6% of decks
Stoneskin 56.6% of decks
Wall of Denial 66.0% of decks
Wall of Denial 66.0% of decks
Tower Defense 59.7% of decks
Tower Defense 59.7% of decks
Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive 63.5% of decks
Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive 63.5% of decks
Axebane Guardian 62.3% of decks
Axebane Guardian 62.3% of decks
Overgrown Battlement 62.9% of decks
Overgrown Battlement 62.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Arcades, the Strategist relevance 2.34 · 1.0% (116 of 11,152 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Stoneskin relevance 2.13 · 56.6% (90 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.93 · 66.0% (105 of 159 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.93 · 59.7% (95 of 159 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.91 · 63.5% (101 of 159 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.85 · 62.3% (99 of 159 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.84 · 62.9% (100 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.77 · 54.7% (87 of 159 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.76 · 57.2% (91 of 159 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.70 · 53.5% (85 of 159 decks)
- Aegis of the Heavens relevance 1.69 · 30.8% (49 of 159 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.68 · 54.7% (87 of 159 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.68 · 50.3% (80 of 159 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.61 · 50.3% (80 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.54 · 53.5% (85 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.52 · 53.5% (85 of 159 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.52 · 49.1% (78 of 159 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.48 · 44.7% (71 of 159 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.46 · 46.5% (74 of 159 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.44 · 42.8% (68 of 159 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.43 · 47.8% (76 of 159 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 1.37 · 32.1% (51 of 159 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.37 · 40.9% (65 of 159 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.32 · 42.8% (68 of 159 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.31 · 37.7% (60 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.30 · 37.7% (60 of 159 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 1.30 · 35.2% (56 of 159 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.27 · 42.8% (68 of 159 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 1.21 · 35.8% (57 of 159 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.18 · 34.6% (55 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.17 · 33.3% (53 of 159 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.93 · 66.0% (105 of 159 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.91 · 63.5% (101 of 159 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.85 · 62.3% (99 of 159 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.84 · 62.9% (100 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.77 · 54.7% (87 of 159 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.68 · 54.7% (87 of 159 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.68 · 50.3% (80 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.54 · 53.5% (85 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.52 · 53.5% (85 of 159 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.52 · 49.1% (78 of 159 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.48 · 44.7% (71 of 159 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.46 · 46.5% (74 of 159 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.44 · 42.8% (68 of 159 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.43 · 47.8% (76 of 159 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 1.37 · 32.1% (51 of 159 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.37 · 40.9% (65 of 159 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.31 · 37.7% (60 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.30 · 37.7% (60 of 159 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 1.30 · 35.2% (56 of 159 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.27 · 42.8% (68 of 159 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.18 · 34.6% (55 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.17 · 33.3% (53 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.17 · 32.1% (51 of 159 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 1.13 · 29.6% (47 of 159 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.12 · 36.5% (58 of 159 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.10 · 30.2% (48 of 159 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 1.09 · 28.3% (45 of 159 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.07 · 33.3% (53 of 159 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 1.02 · 23.9% (38 of 159 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.02 · 29.6% (47 of 159 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 0.98 · 25.8% (41 of 159 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.96 · 22.6% (36 of 159 decks)
- Rampart Architect relevance 0.95 · 22.0% (35 of 159 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 0.94 · 23.3% (37 of 159 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.06 · 30.2% (48 of 159 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.96 · 20.8% (33 of 159 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.93 · 26.4% (42 of 159 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Stoneskin relevance 2.13 · 56.6% (90 of 159 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.76 · 57.2% (91 of 159 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.61 · 50.3% (80 of 159 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 1.02 · 30.2% (48 of 159 decks)
All instants (3)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.93 · 59.7% (95 of 159 decks)
- Aegis of the Heavens relevance 1.69 · 30.8% (49 of 159 decks)
- Bar the Door relevance 1.14 · 27.0% (43 of 159 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.70 · 53.5% (85 of 159 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 1.32 · 42.8% (68 of 159 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 1.21 · 35.8% (57 of 159 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Huatli, the Sun's Heart relevance 1.11 · 27.0% (43 of 159 decks)
- Teyo, the Shieldmage relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (33 of 159 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Access Tunnel relevance 1.01 · 27.0% (43 of 159 decks)
EDH data for Refuse to Yield: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 159 real decks.
































