Greater Sandwurm
Played in 214 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 2.56 · 2.9% (55 of 1,879 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 1.69 · 1.6% (23 of 1,406 decks)
- Jarsyl, Dark Age Scion relevance 0.72 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.39 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.38 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Stangg relevance 0.37 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.30 · 23.4% (50 of 214 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 1.26 · 19.6% (42 of 214 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.23 · 29.4% (63 of 214 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.21 · 22.4% (48 of 214 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.20 · 21.5% (46 of 214 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.19 · 31.3% (67 of 214 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.15 · 21.5% (46 of 214 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.15 · 22.0% (47 of 214 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 1.14 · 22.4% (48 of 214 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (47 of 214 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 1.08 · 24.3% (52 of 214 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.04 · 19.2% (41 of 214 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 1.03 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.96 · 17.3% (37 of 214 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (42 of 214 decks)
- Cavern Stomper relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.87 · 16.4% (35 of 214 decks)
- Ripscale Predator relevance 0.86 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.86 · 13.1% (28 of 214 decks)
- Gargadon relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (33 of 214 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.79 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (24 of 214 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 0.72 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Migrating Ketradon relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (22 of 214 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.70 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.67 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 1.30 · 23.4% (50 of 214 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 1.26 · 19.6% (42 of 214 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.23 · 29.4% (63 of 214 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 1.21 · 22.4% (48 of 214 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 1.20 · 21.5% (46 of 214 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.19 · 31.3% (67 of 214 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.15 · 21.5% (46 of 214 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.15 · 22.0% (47 of 214 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 1.14 · 22.4% (48 of 214 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (47 of 214 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 1.08 · 24.3% (52 of 214 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 1.04 · 19.2% (41 of 214 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 1.03 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.96 · 17.3% (37 of 214 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (42 of 214 decks)
- Cavern Stomper relevance 0.94 · 15.0% (32 of 214 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 0.87 · 16.4% (35 of 214 decks)
- Ripscale Predator relevance 0.86 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
- Rust Goliath relevance 0.86 · 13.1% (28 of 214 decks)
- Gargadon relevance 0.85 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.83 · 15.4% (33 of 214 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.79 · 12.6% (27 of 214 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 0.72 · 11.2% (24 of 214 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 0.72 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Migrating Ketradon relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (22 of 214 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 0.70 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.67 · 12.1% (26 of 214 decks)
- Skyscythe Engulfer relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (20 of 214 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (25 of 214 decks)
- Molten Monstrosity relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (20 of 214 decks)
- Hill Gigas relevance 0.56 · 8.9% (19 of 214 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (23 of 214 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 0.55 · 7.9% (17 of 214 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (20 of 214 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (22 of 214 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.54 · 11.2% (24 of 214 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 0.53 · 8.4% (18 of 214 decks)
- Rapacious One relevance 0.52 · 10.3% (22 of 214 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (19 of 214 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (30 of 214 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (17 of 214 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.48 · 25.7% (55 of 214 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.91 · 39.7% (85 of 214 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (20 of 214 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (19 of 214 decks)
All lands (2)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.63 · 20.1% (43 of 214 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.53 · 34.6% (74 of 214 decks)
EDH data for Greater Sandwurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 214 real decks.