Eaten by Spiders
Played in 62 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
8.0% Jund
All commanders (1)
- Thantis, the Warweaver relevance 2.75 · 1.3% (51 of 3,870 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Spider Spawning relevance 4.41 · 72.6% (45 of 62 decks)
- Ishkanah, Grafwidow relevance 3.34 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 3.25 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 3.23 · 79.0% (49 of 62 decks)
- Shelob, Child of Ungoliant relevance 3.23 · 67.7% (42 of 62 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 3.20 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 3.14 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 3.14 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Drider relevance 3.13 · 48.4% (30 of 62 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 3.08 · 46.8% (29 of 62 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 3.03 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 3.01 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 2.97 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Dragonlair Spider relevance 2.90 · 71.0% (44 of 62 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 2.85 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Hatchery Spider relevance 2.85 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 2.65 · 72.6% (45 of 62 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 2.58 · 46.8% (29 of 62 decks)
- Skyfisher Spider relevance 2.50 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 2.47 · 40.3% (25 of 62 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 2.32 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Doom Weaver relevance 2.20 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 2.07 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 1.93 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 1.81 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Spider Manifestation relevance 1.81 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 1.71 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 1.51 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 1.50 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 1.37 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Ishkanah, Grafwidow relevance 3.34 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 3.25 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 3.23 · 79.0% (49 of 62 decks)
- Shelob, Child of Ungoliant relevance 3.23 · 67.7% (42 of 62 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 3.20 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 3.14 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 3.14 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Drider relevance 3.13 · 48.4% (30 of 62 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 3.08 · 46.8% (29 of 62 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 3.03 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Dragonlair Spider relevance 2.90 · 71.0% (44 of 62 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 2.85 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Hatchery Spider relevance 2.85 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 2.58 · 46.8% (29 of 62 decks)
- Skyfisher Spider relevance 2.50 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 2.47 · 40.3% (25 of 62 decks)
- Doom Weaver relevance 2.20 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 2.07 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 1.93 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 1.81 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Spider Manifestation relevance 1.81 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 1.51 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Spider-Punk relevance 1.36 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- The Swarmweaver relevance 1.20 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Obelisk Spider relevance 1.18 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Juvenile Gloomwidow relevance 1.16 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 1.04 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Spider-Ham, Peter Porker relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.86 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Nyx Weaver relevance 0.83 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Broodspinner relevance 0.81 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Door of Destinies relevance 1.71 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 1.50 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 1.37 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.85 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.82 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 3.01 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 1.33 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.03 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Deathreap Ritual relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
All instants (6)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 2.65 · 72.6% (45 of 62 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 2.32 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Fog relevance 1.30 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 1.19 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Winds of Qal Sisma relevance 1.01 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Golgari Charm relevance 0.80 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Spider Spawning relevance 4.41 · 72.6% (45 of 62 decks)
- Swarmyard Massacre relevance 0.99 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 2.97 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Swarmyard relevance 1.94 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Eaten by Spiders: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.