Culmination of Studies
Played in 1,467 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
83.4% Izzet
- Izzet 1,467 · 83.4%
- Grixis 89 · 5.1%
- Jeskai 74 · 4.2%
- Temur 70 · 4.0%
- Five-Color 36 · 2.0%
- Other (6) 22 · 1.3%
All commanders (29)
- Galazeth Prismari relevance 2.35 · 6.0% (166 of 2,779 decks)
- Lilah, Undefeated Slickshot relevance 1.89 · 5.1% (79 of 1,548 decks)
- Ghyrson Starn, Kelermorph relevance 1.60 · 2.2% (218 of 9,944 decks)
- Zaffai, Thunder Conductor relevance 1.47 · 4.1% (40 of 965 decks)
- Magnus the Red relevance 1.22 · 2.0% (72 of 3,550 decks)
- Tellah, Great Sage relevance 1.18 · 2.5% (40 of 1,581 decks)
- Kaza, Roil Chaser relevance 1.07 · 2.8% (24 of 857 decks)
- Mizzix of the Izmagnus relevance 1.05 · 1.8% (51 of 2,884 decks)
- Vadrik, Astral Archmage relevance 0.98 · 1.9% (35 of 1,875 decks)
- Tibor and Lumia relevance 0.95 · 3.8% (11 of 287 decks)
- Rootha, Mercurial Artist relevance 0.74 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Will Kenrith // Rowan Kenrith relevance 0.73 · 2.2% (11 of 511 decks)
- Breeches, the Blastmaker relevance 0.71 · 1.8% (13 of 716 decks)
- Johann, Apprentice Sorcerer relevance 0.70 · 4.0% (5 of 125 decks)
- Ryan Sinclair // The Fifteenth Doctor relevance 0.68 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Baral and Kari Zev relevance 0.65 · 2.0% (9 of 448 decks)
- Keranos, God of Storms relevance 0.61 · 1.8% (9 of 503 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.55 · 1.1% (15 of 1,394 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.50 · 1.2% (9 of 732 decks)
- Iceman and Firestar relevance 0.49 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Popular Entertainer relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 0.44 · 1.1% (8 of 735 decks)
- Tavern Brawler // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Clan Crafter relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains // Raphael, the Muscle relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (3 of 189 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Belligerent relevance 0.33 · 1.5% (3 of 204 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Epic Experiment relevance 0.66 · 20.7% (304 of 1,467 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.59 · 35.2% (517 of 1,467 decks)
- Electrolyze relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (250 of 1,467 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.58 · 21.0% (308 of 1,467 decks)
- Expansion // Explosion relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (278 of 1,467 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (230 of 1,467 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (199 of 1,467 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.54 · 23.0% (337 of 1,467 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.52 · 17.0% (249 of 1,467 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.51 · 17.9% (262 of 1,467 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.49 · 10.8% (158 of 1,467 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.49 · 19.8% (291 of 1,467 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.48 · 34.0% (499 of 1,467 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.47 · 15.1% (222 of 1,467 decks)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (254 of 1,467 decks)
- Practical Research relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (147 of 1,467 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.46 · 33.4% (490 of 1,467 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.46 · 17.5% (256 of 1,467 decks)
- Exalted Flamer of Tzeentch relevance 0.46 · 15.9% (233 of 1,467 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (208 of 1,467 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.44 · 16.4% (240 of 1,467 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (188 of 1,467 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (131 of 1,467 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (223 of 1,467 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (220 of 1,467 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.43 · 33.8% (496 of 1,467 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (294 of 1,467 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.42 · 22.1% (324 of 1,467 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.41 · 18.1% (265 of 1,467 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (184 of 1,467 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.48 · 34.0% (499 of 1,467 decks)
- Exalted Flamer of Tzeentch relevance 0.46 · 15.9% (233 of 1,467 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.43 · 15.2% (223 of 1,467 decks)
- Sanar, Unfinished Genius // Wild Idea relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (220 of 1,467 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (294 of 1,467 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.41 · 18.1% (265 of 1,467 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 0.40 · 22.2% (325 of 1,467 decks)
- Kessig Flamebreather relevance 0.38 · 14.8% (217 of 1,467 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (316 of 1,467 decks)
All instants (20)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.59 · 35.2% (517 of 1,467 decks)
- Electrolyze relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (250 of 1,467 decks)
- Expansion // Explosion relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (278 of 1,467 decks)
- Teach by Example relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (230 of 1,467 decks)
- Comet Storm relevance 0.52 · 17.0% (249 of 1,467 decks)
- Creative Outburst relevance 0.49 · 10.8% (158 of 1,467 decks)
- Magma Opus relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (254 of 1,467 decks)
- Practical Research relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (147 of 1,467 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.46 · 17.5% (256 of 1,467 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 0.44 · 16.4% (240 of 1,467 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (188 of 1,467 decks)
- Big Score relevance 0.43 · 33.8% (496 of 1,467 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 0.42 · 22.1% (324 of 1,467 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (184 of 1,467 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (189 of 1,467 decks)
- Mindswipe relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (115 of 1,467 decks)
- Electrickery relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (159 of 1,467 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.38 · 19.0% (279 of 1,467 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (144 of 1,467 decks)
- Traumatic Critique relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (177 of 1,467 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Epic Experiment relevance 0.66 · 20.7% (304 of 1,467 decks)
- Brass's Bounty relevance 0.58 · 21.0% (308 of 1,467 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (199 of 1,467 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.54 · 23.0% (337 of 1,467 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.51 · 17.9% (262 of 1,467 decks)
- Seize the Spoils relevance 0.49 · 19.8% (291 of 1,467 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.47 · 15.1% (222 of 1,467 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.46 · 33.4% (490 of 1,467 decks)
- End the Festivities relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (208 of 1,467 decks)
- Elemental Masterpiece relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (131 of 1,467 decks)
- Apex of Power relevance 0.40 · 11.6% (170 of 1,467 decks)
- Inspired Tinkering relevance 0.40 · 11.8% (173 of 1,467 decks)
- Blazing Volley relevance 0.40 · 11.2% (165 of 1,467 decks)
- Pirate's Pillage relevance 0.39 · 14.7% (216 of 1,467 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 0.38 · 6.9% (101 of 1,467 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Prismari Campus relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (212 of 1,467 decks)
All lands (5)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.44 · 21.8% (320 of 1,467 decks)
- Eroded Canyon relevance 0.43 · 13.8% (202 of 1,467 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.43 · 32.7% (480 of 1,467 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.38 · 18.7% (274 of 1,467 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.38 · 27.9% (409 of 1,467 decks)
EDH data for Culmination of Studies: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,467 real decks.