Cinderclasm
Played in 105 Grixis decks
30+13+5+18+7+1+6+
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Grixis
Most Relevant
Oracle of Tragedy 55.2% of decks
Oracle of Tragedy 55.2% of decks
Dragonologist 53.3% of decks
Dragonologist 53.3% of decks
Micromancer 57.1% of decks
Micromancer 57.1% of decks
Fountainport Bell 54.3% of decks
Fountainport Bell 54.3% of decks
Cathartic Pyre 60.0% of decks
Cathartic Pyre 60.0% of decks
Dimir Charm 54.3% of decks
Dimir Charm 54.3% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Oracle of Tragedy relevance 3.68 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Dragonologist relevance 3.56 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
- Micromancer relevance 3.49 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 3.44 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Cathartic Pyre relevance 3.43 · 60.0% (63 of 105 decks)
- Dimir Charm relevance 3.19 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 3.16 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Molten Collapse relevance 3.00 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Augur of Bolas relevance 2.96 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 2.95 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 2.94 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 2.92 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Shock relevance 2.80 · 61.0% (64 of 105 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 2.71 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Prismari Charm relevance 2.59 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 2.49 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 2.45 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 2.39 · 51.4% (54 of 105 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 2.34 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 2.20 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 2.15 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 2.14 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 2.12 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Maestros Charm relevance 2.09 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 2.07 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 2.06 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 2.04 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Step Through relevance 1.99 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.97 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.95 · 61.9% (65 of 105 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Oracle of Tragedy relevance 3.68 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Dragonologist relevance 3.56 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
- Micromancer relevance 3.49 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Augur of Bolas relevance 2.96 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 2.94 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 2.49 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 2.34 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Ruthless Technomancer relevance 2.15 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 2.14 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 2.06 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.97 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 1.93 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 1.48 · 62.9% (66 of 105 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 3.44 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 2.95 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 2.92 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 1.44 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 1.42 · 65.7% (69 of 105 decks)
All instants (18)
- Cathartic Pyre relevance 3.43 · 60.0% (63 of 105 decks)
- Dimir Charm relevance 3.19 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 3.16 · 57.1% (60 of 105 decks)
- Shock relevance 2.80 · 61.0% (64 of 105 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 2.71 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Prismari Charm relevance 2.59 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 2.39 · 51.4% (54 of 105 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 2.12 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Maestros Charm relevance 2.09 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 2.04 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 1.95 · 61.9% (65 of 105 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 1.91 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Dispel relevance 1.90 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 1.68 · 61.0% (64 of 105 decks)
- Abrade relevance 1.64 · 70.5% (74 of 105 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 1.63 · 59.0% (62 of 105 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 1.48 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 1.45 · 53.3% (56 of 105 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Molten Collapse relevance 3.00 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 2.45 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 2.20 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 2.07 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Step Through relevance 1.99 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Persist relevance 1.93 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 1.90 · 54.3% (57 of 105 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 3.30 · 52.4% (55 of 105 decks)
All lands (6)
- Crosis's Catacombs relevance 2.20 · 55.2% (58 of 105 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 1.76 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 1.76 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 1.75 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 1.46 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
- Shadowblood Ridge relevance 1.37 · 56.2% (59 of 105 decks)
EDH data for Cinderclasm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 105 real decks.












































