Fyndhorn Elves
Played in 55,620 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 2.50 · 55.8% (11,946 of 21,412 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 2.42 · 53.8% (10,880 of 20,235 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.21 · 46.5% (9,685 of 20,839 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.97 · 61.4% (1,136 of 1,850 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 1.63 · 51.2% (622 of 1,215 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.49 · 50.8% (365 of 718 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.40 · 30.8% (1,686 of 5,476 decks)
- Trystan, Callous Cultivator // Trystan, Penitent Culler relevance 1.17 · 35.8% (286 of 800 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 1.13 · 31.4% (378 of 1,205 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.11 · 54.4% (68 of 125 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 1.11 · 58.8% (57 of 97 decks)
- The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 1.08 · 24.4% (831 of 3,409 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 1.08 · 26.5% (562 of 2,119 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Master Chef relevance 1.07 · 28.4% (406 of 1,430 decks)
- Tom, Bert, and William relevance 1.03 · 25.4% (496 of 1,955 decks)
- Hogaak, Arisen Necropolis relevance 1.02 · 27.0% (368 of 1,363 decks)
- Meren of Clan Nel Toth relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (2,213 of 12,853 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.93 · 49.4% (41 of 83 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 0.91 · 42.7% (53 of 124 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.89 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.88 · 76.2% (16 of 21 decks)
- Davvol, Evincar of Rath relevance 0.88 · 31.7% (97 of 306 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.85 · 81.3% (13 of 16 decks)
- Bebop & Rocksteady relevance 0.80 · 24.9% (134 of 539 decks)
- Carth the Lion relevance 0.80 · 18.3% (426 of 2,330 decks)
- Varolz, the Scar-Striped relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (232 of 1,149 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.77 · 70.6% (12 of 17 decks)
- Rocksteady, Mutant Marauder // Bebop, Skull & Crossbones relevance 0.76 · 20.6% (193 of 937 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.71 · 32.5% (38 of 117 decks)
- Gargantos, the Endbringer relevance 0.71 · 27.2% (59 of 217 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.08 · 64.1% (35,668 of 55,620 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.89 · 43.9% (24,395 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.82 · 40.9% (22,742 of 55,620 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.81 · 36.3% (20,177 of 55,620 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.78 · 32.3% (17,958 of 55,620 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 30.1% (16,746 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.77 · 32.4% (18,037 of 55,620 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.76 · 37.2% (20,680 of 55,620 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.74 · 29.6% (16,449 of 55,620 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.73 · 33.0% (18,357 of 55,620 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.71 · 26.5% (14,738 of 55,620 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.70 · 30.1% (16,728 of 55,620 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.66 · 33.6% (18,698 of 55,620 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.66 · 42.8% (23,824 of 55,620 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.66 · 26.9% (14,964 of 55,620 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.66 · 32.3% (17,970 of 55,620 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.65 · 23.3% (12,977 of 55,620 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.65 · 34.1% (18,994 of 55,620 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.64 · 24.7% (13,754 of 55,620 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.64 · 24.0% (13,340 of 55,620 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.61 · 26.1% (14,540 of 55,620 decks)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.61 · 23.0% (12,793 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.61 · 23.0% (12,792 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.60 · 20.9% (11,634 of 55,620 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.60 · 22.2% (12,326 of 55,620 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.60 · 23.0% (12,817 of 55,620 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.58 · 22.3% (12,403 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.56 · 19.2% (10,653 of 55,620 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 0.56 · 21.0% (11,706 of 55,620 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (11,486 of 55,620 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.08 · 64.1% (35,668 of 55,620 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.89 · 43.9% (24,395 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.82 · 40.9% (22,742 of 55,620 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.81 · 36.3% (20,177 of 55,620 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.78 · 32.3% (17,958 of 55,620 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 30.1% (16,746 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.77 · 32.4% (18,037 of 55,620 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.76 · 37.2% (20,680 of 55,620 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.74 · 29.6% (16,449 of 55,620 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.73 · 33.0% (18,357 of 55,620 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.71 · 26.5% (14,738 of 55,620 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.66 · 33.6% (18,698 of 55,620 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.66 · 42.8% (23,824 of 55,620 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.66 · 26.9% (14,964 of 55,620 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.66 · 32.3% (17,970 of 55,620 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.65 · 23.3% (12,977 of 55,620 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.65 · 34.1% (18,994 of 55,620 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.64 · 24.0% (13,340 of 55,620 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.61 · 26.1% (14,540 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.60 · 20.9% (11,634 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.56 · 19.2% (10,653 of 55,620 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 0.56 · 21.0% (11,706 of 55,620 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (11,486 of 55,620 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.53 · 18.6% (10,334 of 55,620 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.52 · 17.7% (9,833 of 55,620 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.52 · 16.9% (9,383 of 55,620 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.51 · 16.8% (9,342 of 55,620 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.49 · 18.9% (10,506 of 55,620 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.48 · 18.0% (10,011 of 55,620 decks)
All instants (7)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.64 · 24.7% (13,754 of 55,620 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.60 · 22.2% (12,326 of 55,620 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.60 · 23.0% (12,817 of 55,620 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.52 · 21.4% (11,889 of 55,620 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.50 · 30.4% (16,931 of 55,620 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.49 · 38.9% (21,624 of 55,620 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.49 · 24.9% (13,833 of 55,620 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.70 · 30.1% (16,728 of 55,620 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.61 · 23.0% (12,792 of 55,620 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.58 · 22.3% (12,403 of 55,620 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.54 · 27.2% (15,125 of 55,620 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.51 · 19.1% (10,628 of 55,620 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.49 · 22.5% (12,508 of 55,620 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.61 · 23.0% (12,793 of 55,620 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.63 · 21.7% (12,052 of 55,620 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.58 · 41.0% (22,823 of 55,620 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.53 · 29.9% (16,649 of 55,620 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.49 · 22.8% (12,686 of 55,620 decks)
All lands (3)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 0.62 · 21.6% (11,996 of 55,620 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.57 · 42.8% (23,794 of 55,620 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.51 · 32.1% (17,855 of 55,620 decks)
EDH data for Fyndhorn Elves: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 55,620 real decks.