Shield Sphere
Played in 508 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 5.54 · 30.5% (396 of 1,300 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 1.35 · 19.0% (4 of 21 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Assault Formation relevance 3.48 · 65.6% (333 of 508 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 3.42 · 62.0% (315 of 508 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 3.32 · 67.1% (341 of 508 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 3.29 · 65.2% (331 of 508 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.89 · 51.8% (263 of 508 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.76 · 53.3% (271 of 508 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 2.73 · 53.1% (270 of 508 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 2.66 · 47.0% (239 of 508 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.59 · 62.6% (318 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 2.51 · 40.6% (206 of 508 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 2.48 · 43.7% (222 of 508 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.47 · 41.9% (213 of 508 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 2.38 · 41.3% (210 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.31 · 40.9% (208 of 508 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 2.31 · 41.1% (209 of 508 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 2.26 · 45.9% (233 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 2.26 · 48.0% (244 of 508 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.24 · 56.9% (289 of 508 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 2.22 · 37.2% (189 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 2.20 · 40.0% (203 of 508 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 2.17 · 53.0% (269 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.12 · 33.1% (168 of 508 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 2.07 · 63.6% (323 of 508 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 1.97 · 35.6% (181 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.91 · 32.5% (165 of 508 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.84 · 31.9% (162 of 508 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 1.81 · 28.3% (144 of 508 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.80 · 37.6% (191 of 508 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.80 · 37.2% (189 of 508 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.77 · 38.4% (195 of 508 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 3.42 · 62.0% (315 of 508 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 3.32 · 67.1% (341 of 508 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 3.29 · 65.2% (331 of 508 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.89 · 51.8% (263 of 508 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 2.76 · 53.3% (271 of 508 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 2.73 · 53.1% (270 of 508 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 2.66 · 47.0% (239 of 508 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.59 · 62.6% (318 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 2.51 · 40.6% (206 of 508 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 2.48 · 43.7% (222 of 508 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.47 · 41.9% (213 of 508 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 2.38 · 41.3% (210 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.31 · 40.9% (208 of 508 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 2.26 · 45.9% (233 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 2.26 · 48.0% (244 of 508 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.24 · 56.9% (289 of 508 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 2.22 · 37.2% (189 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 2.20 · 40.0% (203 of 508 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 2.17 · 53.0% (269 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.12 · 33.1% (168 of 508 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.91 · 32.5% (165 of 508 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.84 · 31.9% (162 of 508 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 1.81 · 28.3% (144 of 508 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.80 · 37.6% (191 of 508 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.80 · 37.2% (189 of 508 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.77 · 38.4% (195 of 508 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 1.70 · 50.0% (254 of 508 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 1.69 · 48.8% (248 of 508 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.63 · 26.0% (132 of 508 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 1.56 · 26.6% (135 of 508 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 1.41 · 23.4% (119 of 508 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 1.30 · 37.8% (192 of 508 decks)
- Tapestry Warden relevance 1.29 · 20.5% (104 of 508 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 1.21 · 23.0% (117 of 508 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 1.19 · 41.3% (210 of 508 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 1.76 · 28.7% (146 of 508 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 1.22 · 19.5% (99 of 508 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 1.22 · 20.5% (104 of 508 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 1.21 · 24.6% (125 of 508 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Assault Formation relevance 3.48 · 65.6% (333 of 508 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 2.31 · 41.1% (209 of 508 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 2.07 · 63.6% (323 of 508 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.37 · 39.0% (198 of 508 decks)
All instants (3)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.72 · 28.3% (144 of 508 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 1.35 · 25.6% (130 of 508 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 1.26 · 21.3% (108 of 508 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 1.97 · 35.6% (181 of 508 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.64 · 44.1% (224 of 508 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Access Tunnel relevance 2.12 · 44.7% (227 of 508 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.28 · 25.2% (128 of 508 decks)
EDH data for Shield Sphere: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 508 real decks.