Seam Rip
Played in 235 Esper decks
Color Identity Spread
6.8% Esper
130+13+2+16+14+2+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Zur, Eternal Schemer relevance 1.87 · 1.2% (41 of 3,522 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Banishing Light relevance 1.13 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 0.98 · 17.0% (40 of 235 decks)
- Inquisitive Glimmer relevance 0.81 · 27.2% (64 of 235 decks)
- Prismatic Ending relevance 0.79 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Temporary Lockdown relevance 0.73 · 11.1% (26 of 235 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.69 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (24 of 235 decks)
- Detention Sphere relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Sheltered by Ghosts relevance 0.65 · 17.9% (42 of 235 decks)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.63 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (47 of 235 decks)
- Alseid of Life's Bounty relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.62 · 24.3% (57 of 235 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.61 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.60 · 12.3% (29 of 235 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.60 · 22.1% (52 of 235 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (26 of 235 decks)
- Overlord of the Mistmoors relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Enduring Innocence relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Demon of Fate's Design relevance 0.55 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Momentum Breaker relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.55 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.54 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (25 of 235 decks)
- Journey to Nowhere relevance 0.53 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
- Extinguish All Hope relevance 0.53 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Inquisitive Glimmer relevance 0.81 · 27.2% (64 of 235 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (47 of 235 decks)
- Alseid of Life's Bounty relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.62 · 24.3% (57 of 235 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.61 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- Overlord of the Mistmoors relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Enduring Innocence relevance 0.58 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
- Demon of Fate's Design relevance 0.55 · 16.6% (39 of 235 decks)
- The Master of Keys relevance 0.50 · 13.2% (31 of 235 decks)
- Archetype of Courage relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (24 of 235 decks)
- Overlord of the Balemurk relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (26 of 235 decks)
- Zur the Enchanter relevance 0.48 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Agent of Erebos relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.60 · 12.3% (29 of 235 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.48 · 17.0% (40 of 235 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Banishing Light relevance 1.13 · 26.0% (61 of 235 decks)
- Parallax Wave relevance 0.98 · 17.0% (40 of 235 decks)
- Temporary Lockdown relevance 0.73 · 11.1% (26 of 235 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.69 · 23.4% (55 of 235 decks)
- Detention Sphere relevance 0.67 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Sheltered by Ghosts relevance 0.65 · 17.9% (42 of 235 decks)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.63 · 14.0% (33 of 235 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.60 · 22.1% (52 of 235 decks)
- Momentum Breaker relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Journey to Nowhere relevance 0.53 · 8.5% (20 of 235 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (25 of 235 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 0.49 · 14.9% (35 of 235 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Oath of Kaya relevance 0.48 · 8.1% (19 of 235 decks)
All instants (14)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.67 · 10.2% (24 of 235 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (26 of 235 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.55 · 8.9% (21 of 235 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.54 · 11.5% (27 of 235 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (25 of 235 decks)
- Mana Tithe relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (23 of 235 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.51 · 12.3% (29 of 235 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.50 · 9.4% (22 of 235 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.48 · 22.1% (52 of 235 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.48 · 9.8% (23 of 235 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (32 of 235 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Prismatic Ending relevance 0.79 · 12.8% (30 of 235 decks)
- Extinguish All Hope relevance 0.53 · 11.9% (28 of 235 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.50 · 21.7% (51 of 235 decks)
All lands (2)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.60 · 18.7% (44 of 235 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.55 · 17.9% (42 of 235 decks)
EDH data for Seam Rip: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 235 real decks.



















































