Curse of the Forsaken
Played in 216 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 2.99 · 12.4% (24 of 194 decks)
- Mathas, Fiend Seeker relevance 2.23 · 2.2% (37 of 1,654 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 1.62 · 1.2% (24 of 1,960 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.34 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 3.39 · 62.0% (134 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 3.14 · 48.1% (104 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 2.92 · 43.1% (93 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 2.63 · 54.2% (117 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 2.43 · 39.4% (85 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 2.35 · 39.8% (86 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 2.28 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 2.25 · 38.9% (84 of 216 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 2.13 · 36.1% (78 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 2.13 · 33.3% (72 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 2.04 · 30.1% (65 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 2.03 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 2.00 · 30.1% (65 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 1.99 · 31.9% (69 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.95 · 70.4% (152 of 216 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 1.92 · 29.6% (64 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 1.84 · 28.2% (61 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Obsession relevance 1.84 · 26.9% (58 of 216 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 1.78 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Curse of the Restless Dead relevance 1.68 · 25.0% (54 of 216 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 1.54 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 1.39 · 22.2% (48 of 216 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.37 · 26.4% (57 of 216 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 1.25 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 1.13 · 19.9% (43 of 216 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.09 · 25.0% (54 of 216 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 1.08 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 1.08 · 24.1% (52 of 216 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 1.01 · 20.4% (44 of 216 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.95 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.37 · 26.4% (57 of 216 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 1.25 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Death Kiss relevance 0.94 · 16.7% (36 of 216 decks)
- Breena, the Demagogue relevance 0.90 · 36.1% (78 of 216 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.89 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Ondu Spiritdancer relevance 0.87 · 16.2% (35 of 216 decks)
- Eriette of the Charmed Apple relevance 0.86 · 13.4% (29 of 216 decks)
- Combat Calligrapher relevance 0.86 · 19.4% (42 of 216 decks)
- Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs relevance 0.85 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Karazikar, the Eye Tyrant relevance 0.73 · 21.3% (46 of 216 decks)
- Mangara, the Diplomat relevance 0.70 · 23.6% (51 of 216 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (22 of 216 decks)
- Calculating Lich relevance 0.69 · 10.6% (23 of 216 decks)
- Bounty Hunter relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 3.39 · 62.0% (134 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 3.14 · 48.1% (104 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 2.92 · 43.1% (93 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 2.63 · 54.2% (117 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 2.43 · 39.4% (85 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 2.35 · 39.8% (86 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 2.28 · 34.3% (74 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 2.25 · 38.9% (84 of 216 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 2.13 · 36.1% (78 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Shaken Faith relevance 2.13 · 33.3% (72 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 2.04 · 30.1% (65 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 2.03 · 32.9% (71 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 2.00 · 30.1% (65 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 1.99 · 31.9% (69 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.95 · 70.4% (152 of 216 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 1.92 · 29.6% (64 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 1.84 · 28.2% (61 of 216 decks)
- Curse of Obsession relevance 1.84 · 26.9% (58 of 216 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 1.78 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Curse of the Restless Dead relevance 1.68 · 25.0% (54 of 216 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 1.54 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 1.39 · 22.2% (48 of 216 decks)
- Hissing Miasma relevance 1.13 · 19.9% (43 of 216 decks)
- Revenge of Ravens relevance 1.09 · 25.0% (54 of 216 decks)
- Marchesa's Decree relevance 1.08 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 1.08 · 24.1% (52 of 216 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 1.01 · 20.4% (44 of 216 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.95 · 27.3% (59 of 216 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 0.94 · 16.2% (35 of 216 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.85 · 32.4% (70 of 216 decks)
- Righteous Cause relevance 0.82 · 14.4% (31 of 216 decks)
- Maddening Hex relevance 0.75 · 22.2% (48 of 216 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 0.72 · 13.9% (30 of 216 decks)
- Grievous Wound relevance 0.70 · 13.0% (28 of 216 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (49 of 216 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (36 of 216 decks)
EDH data for Curse of the Forsaken: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 216 real decks.