Cruel Fate
Played in 45 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
36.6% Azorius
130+19+2+6+11+12+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Daxos of Meletis relevance 1.35 · 1.4% (5 of 357 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Counterlash relevance 4.70 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 4.65 · 71.1% (32 of 45 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 4.62 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.44 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 4.42 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.35 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 4.30 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.26 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 4.26 · 71.1% (32 of 45 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.22 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.20 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.14 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 4.12 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.11 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 4.11 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.10 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Council of the Absolute relevance 4.09 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 4.09 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Chill relevance 4.08 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Academy Journeymage relevance 4.07 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 4.05 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 4.05 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.04 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 4.03 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 4.01 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 4.00 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Curse of Unbinding relevance 4.00 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 4.00 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 3.99 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.99 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 4.42 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 4.26 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 4.12 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 4.11 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 4.11 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Council of the Absolute relevance 4.09 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 4.09 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Academy Journeymage relevance 4.07 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 4.05 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 4.00 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.99 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.99 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 3.99 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 3.97 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 3.96 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Chancellor of the Spires relevance 3.95 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 3.90 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 3.85 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 3.84 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 4.00 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Collector's Case relevance 3.97 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 4.62 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 4.26 · 71.1% (32 of 45 decks)
- Chill relevance 4.08 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Curse of Unbinding relevance 4.00 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Curse of the Bloody Tome relevance 3.94 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Ancestral Knowledge relevance 3.84 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
All instants (11)
- Counterlash relevance 4.70 · 68.9% (31 of 45 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.22 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Curfew relevance 4.20 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.14 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 4.04 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 3.99 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 3.98 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 3.92 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 3.89 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.89 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Debt of Loyalty relevance 3.84 · 55.6% (25 of 45 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Cultural Exchange relevance 4.65 · 71.1% (32 of 45 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.44 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 4.35 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 4.30 · 64.4% (29 of 45 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.10 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 4.05 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 4.03 · 62.2% (28 of 45 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 4.01 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 3.98 · 57.8% (26 of 45 decks)
- Diminishing Returns relevance 3.94 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 3.94 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 3.93 · 60.0% (27 of 45 decks)
EDH data for Cruel Fate: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 45 real decks.



















































