Riptide Chronologist
Played in 66 Blue decks
330+40+3+4+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
32.4% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
Riptide Director 56.1% of decks
Riptide Director 56.1% of decks
Patron Wizard 62.1% of decks
Patron Wizard 62.1% of decks
Information Dealer 43.9% of decks
Information Dealer 43.9% of decks
Voidmage Prodigy 48.5% of decks
Voidmage Prodigy 48.5% of decks
Cyclone Summoner 45.5% of decks
Cyclone Summoner 45.5% of decks
Stonybrook Banneret 56.1% of decks
Stonybrook Banneret 56.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 2.69 · 1.7% (40 of 2,321 decks)
- Reveka, Wizard Savant relevance 1.64 · 4.8% (5 of 104 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.52 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Riptide Director relevance 3.15 · 56.1% (37 of 66 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 2.56 · 62.1% (41 of 66 decks)
- Information Dealer relevance 2.41 · 43.9% (29 of 66 decks)
- Voidmage Prodigy relevance 2.40 · 48.5% (32 of 66 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 2.06 · 45.5% (30 of 66 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 1.89 · 56.1% (37 of 66 decks)
- Supreme Inquisitor relevance 1.88 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Aphetto Grifter relevance 1.66 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 1.55 · 40.9% (27 of 66 decks)
- Step Through relevance 1.48 · 48.5% (32 of 66 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 1.41 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Daring Apprentice relevance 1.38 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.36 · 39.4% (26 of 66 decks)
- Inspired Sprite relevance 1.31 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Ixidor's Will relevance 1.31 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 1.26 · 31.8% (21 of 66 decks)
- Brine Seer relevance 1.24 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 1.23 · 21.2% (14 of 66 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 1.22 · 34.8% (23 of 66 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Sea Scryer relevance 1.14 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 1.13 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 1.12 · 47.0% (31 of 66 decks)
- Faces of the Past relevance 1.12 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 1.11 · 40.9% (27 of 66 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 1.09 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Graceful Adept relevance 1.09 · 21.2% (14 of 66 decks)
- Sigil Tracer relevance 1.07 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 1.04 · 27.3% (18 of 66 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 1.04 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Riptide Director relevance 3.15 · 56.1% (37 of 66 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 2.56 · 62.1% (41 of 66 decks)
- Information Dealer relevance 2.41 · 43.9% (29 of 66 decks)
- Voidmage Prodigy relevance 2.40 · 48.5% (32 of 66 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 2.06 · 45.5% (30 of 66 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 1.89 · 56.1% (37 of 66 decks)
- Supreme Inquisitor relevance 1.88 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Aphetto Grifter relevance 1.66 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 1.55 · 40.9% (27 of 66 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 1.41 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Daring Apprentice relevance 1.38 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Inspired Sprite relevance 1.31 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 1.26 · 31.8% (21 of 66 decks)
- Brine Seer relevance 1.24 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 1.23 · 21.2% (14 of 66 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 1.22 · 34.8% (23 of 66 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 1.18 · 33.3% (22 of 66 decks)
- Sea Scryer relevance 1.14 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 1.13 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 1.12 · 47.0% (31 of 66 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 1.11 · 40.9% (27 of 66 decks)
- Prodigal Sorcerer relevance 1.09 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Graceful Adept relevance 1.09 · 21.2% (14 of 66 decks)
- Sigil Tracer relevance 1.07 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 1.04 · 27.3% (18 of 66 decks)
- Disruptive Student relevance 1.03 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Martyr of Frost relevance 1.03 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 1.00 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Sage of Epityr relevance 0.92 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.91 · 56.1% (37 of 66 decks)
- Mistcaller relevance 0.86 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.84 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.83 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Sage of Fables relevance 0.80 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Fatespinner relevance 0.80 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.78 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
- Surgespanner relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Mizzium Meddler relevance 0.75 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Cursecatcher relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Puppeteer relevance 0.72 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Faces of the Past relevance 1.12 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.99 · 27.3% (18 of 66 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.87 · 31.8% (21 of 66 decks)
All instants (4)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 1.36 · 39.4% (26 of 66 decks)
- Ixidor's Will relevance 1.31 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 1.04 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Sage's Dousing relevance 0.91 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Step Through relevance 1.48 · 48.5% (32 of 66 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 1.35 · 53.0% (35 of 66 decks)
EDH data for Riptide Chronologist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 66 real decks.






























