Tel-Jilad Wolf
Played in 25 Golgari decks
130+42+2+2+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
28.4% Golgari
Commanders
Most Relevant
Nighthowl Pursuer 72.0% of decks
Nighthowl Pursuer 72.0% of decks
Chief Warg's Company 80.0% of decks
Chief Warg's Company 80.0% of decks
Desolation Prowler 60.0% of decks
Desolation Prowler 60.0% of decks
Ravening Warg 68.0% of decks
Ravening Warg 68.0% of decks
Ferocious Pup 64.0% of decks
Ferocious Pup 64.0% of decks
Nightpack Ambusher 68.0% of decks
Nightpack Ambusher 68.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- The Chief Warg relevance 1.72 · 1.4% (5 of 367 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nighthowl Pursuer relevance 3.46 · 72.0% (18 of 25 decks)
- Chief Warg's Company relevance 3.41 · 80.0% (20 of 25 decks)
- Desolation Prowler relevance 3.34 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Ravening Warg relevance 3.25 · 68.0% (17 of 25 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 3.21 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 3.17 · 68.0% (17 of 25 decks)
- Wargling relevance 3.10 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 3.07 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 3.05 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 3.04 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Sarulf's Packmate relevance 3.03 · 56.0% (14 of 25 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 3.01 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Briarpack Alpha relevance 2.98 · 44.0% (11 of 25 decks)
- Wilderland Scrounger relevance 2.96 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Duskwatch Hunter relevance 2.95 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 2.86 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 2.85 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Skalla Wolf relevance 2.79 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- The Chief Warg relevance 2.76 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Pack Guardian relevance 2.73 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Bejeweled Warg relevance 2.73 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Rhovanion Rampager relevance 2.60 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Fang of the Pack relevance 2.59 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Fierce Witchstalker relevance 2.55 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Sarulf, Realm Eater relevance 2.48 · 56.0% (14 of 25 decks)
- Primal Adversary relevance 2.39 · 44.0% (11 of 25 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 2.38 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Somberwald Alpha relevance 2.38 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Wandering Wolf relevance 2.33 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 2.31 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Nighthowl Pursuer relevance 3.46 · 72.0% (18 of 25 decks)
- Chief Warg's Company relevance 3.41 · 80.0% (20 of 25 decks)
- Desolation Prowler relevance 3.34 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Ravening Warg relevance 3.25 · 68.0% (17 of 25 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 3.21 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 3.17 · 68.0% (17 of 25 decks)
- Wargling relevance 3.10 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 3.07 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 3.05 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 3.04 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Sarulf's Packmate relevance 3.03 · 56.0% (14 of 25 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 3.01 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Briarpack Alpha relevance 2.98 · 44.0% (11 of 25 decks)
- Wilderland Scrounger relevance 2.96 · 64.0% (16 of 25 decks)
- Duskwatch Hunter relevance 2.95 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 2.86 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 2.85 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Skalla Wolf relevance 2.79 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- The Chief Warg relevance 2.76 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Pack Guardian relevance 2.73 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Bejeweled Warg relevance 2.73 · 60.0% (15 of 25 decks)
- Rhovanion Rampager relevance 2.60 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Fang of the Pack relevance 2.59 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Fierce Witchstalker relevance 2.55 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Sarulf, Realm Eater relevance 2.48 · 56.0% (14 of 25 decks)
- Primal Adversary relevance 2.39 · 44.0% (11 of 25 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 2.38 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Somberwald Alpha relevance 2.38 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Wandering Wolf relevance 2.33 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 2.31 · 48.0% (12 of 25 decks)
- Head of the Hunt relevance 2.27 · 52.0% (13 of 25 decks)
- Summon: Fenrir relevance 2.19 · 56.0% (14 of 25 decks)
- Spirit of the Hunt relevance 2.19 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Rot Wolf relevance 2.13 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 2.09 · 44.0% (11 of 25 decks)
- Wolfir Silverheart relevance 2.07 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 2.06 · 44.0% (11 of 25 decks)
- Witchstalker relevance 1.96 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
- Hollow Scavenger // Bakery Raid relevance 1.95 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
- Wicked Wolf relevance 1.71 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
- Torgal, A Fine Hound relevance 1.63 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 1.59 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 1.75 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
- Wolfcaller's Howl relevance 1.60 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
All instants (2)
- Warg Tactics relevance 2.13 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Reverent Howl relevance 2.00 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.50 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mirkwood relevance 1.92 · 40.0% (10 of 25 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.50 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
All lands (1)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.57 · 36.0% (9 of 25 decks)
EDH data for Tel-Jilad Wolf: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 25 real decks.























