Force of Nature
Played in 256 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
256 decks
All commanders (19)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 3.08 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Sliver Queen relevance 2.08 · 1.1% (13 of 1,168 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 1.54 · 4.7% (4 of 85 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 1.46 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Kei Takahashi relevance 1.34 · 12.5% (2 of 16 decks)
- Stangg relevance 1.26 · 3.5% (2 of 57 decks)
- Jerrard of the Closed Fist relevance 1.23 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Gabriel Angelfire relevance 1.22 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Old One Eye relevance 0.79 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
- Lord Magnus relevance 0.78 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Meng Huo, Barbarian King relevance 0.73 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.71 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.66 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
- Beorn, Reluctant Host // Till and Tend relevance 0.61 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Daughter of Autumn relevance 0.61 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.54 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 0.53 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.49 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All parallel cards (2)
All most relevant (30)
- Serra Angel relevance 1.33 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Shivan Dragon relevance 1.32 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Jayemdae Tome relevance 1.13 · 13.3% (34 of 256 decks)
- Cockatrice relevance 1.05 · 10.5% (27 of 256 decks)
- Forcefield relevance 1.03 · 12.9% (33 of 256 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Child of Gaea relevance 1.02 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.96 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Elvish Archers relevance 0.93 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Juzám Djinn relevance 0.90 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.90 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Thicket Basilisk relevance 0.90 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Lord of the Pit relevance 0.88 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 0.86 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Mahamoti Djinn relevance 0.86 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Sedge Troll relevance 0.85 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Vesuvan Doppelganger relevance 0.85 · 10.5% (27 of 256 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.85 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Mungha Wurm relevance 0.83 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (91 of 256 decks)
- Fork relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.74 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 0.74 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Raging River relevance 0.73 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.73 · 17.6% (45 of 256 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.72 · 35.2% (90 of 256 decks)
- Icy Manipulator relevance 0.72 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Word of Command relevance 0.71 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Nightmare relevance 0.70 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Lich relevance 0.70 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Serra Angel relevance 1.33 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Shivan Dragon relevance 1.32 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Cockatrice relevance 1.05 · 10.5% (27 of 256 decks)
- Child of Gaea relevance 1.02 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Elvish Archers relevance 0.93 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Juzám Djinn relevance 0.90 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Thicket Basilisk relevance 0.90 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Lord of the Pit relevance 0.88 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Mahamoti Djinn relevance 0.86 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Sedge Troll relevance 0.85 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Vesuvan Doppelganger relevance 0.85 · 10.5% (27 of 256 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.85 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Mungha Wurm relevance 0.83 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.82 · 35.5% (91 of 256 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.74 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 0.74 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.72 · 35.2% (90 of 256 decks)
- Nightmare relevance 0.70 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Gaea's Liege relevance 0.69 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Northern Paladin relevance 0.69 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Verdant Force relevance 0.67 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Craw Giant relevance 0.65 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Royal Assassin relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Granite Gargoyle relevance 0.63 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Jayemdae Tome relevance 1.13 · 13.3% (34 of 256 decks)
- Forcefield relevance 1.03 · 12.9% (33 of 256 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.90 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Icy Manipulator relevance 0.72 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Gauntlet of Might relevance 0.68 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Raging River relevance 0.73 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Lich relevance 0.70 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.66 · 20.7% (53 of 256 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.63 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
All instants (2)
- Fork relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Word of Command relevance 0.71 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Hurricane relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.96 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 0.86 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.73 · 17.6% (45 of 256 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.69 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Desert Twister relevance 0.67 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.64 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Bazaar of Baghdad relevance 0.70 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale relevance 0.68 · 10.5% (27 of 256 decks)
All lands (5)
- Savannah relevance 0.87 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.80 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.66 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Plateau relevance 0.66 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.63 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
EDH data for Force of Nature: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 256 real decks.