Bitter Feud
Played in 161 Mardu decks
230+15+2+27+4+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Curse of Bloodletting 25.5% of decks
Curse of Bloodletting 25.5% of decks
Curse of Opulence 49.7% of decks
Curse of Opulence 49.7% of decks
Captive Audience 24.8% of decks
Captive Audience 24.8% of decks
Curse of Misfortunes 20.5% of decks
Curse of Misfortunes 20.5% of decks
Curse of Exhaustion 19.3% of decks
Curse of Exhaustion 19.3% of decks
Curse of Disturbance 23.6% of decks
Curse of Disturbance 23.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Mathas, Fiend Seeker relevance 2.35 · 2.1% (35 of 1,667 decks)
- Ghen, Arcanum Weaver relevance 1.69 · 1.1% (22 of 1,971 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 1.50 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.38 · 49.7% (80 of 161 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 1.28 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 1.27 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 1.19 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 1.15 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.15 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 1.14 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 1.09 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 1.09 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 1.05 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 1.03 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.00 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Bounty Hunter relevance 0.99 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 0.97 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 0.97 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.95 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.95 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Bounty Board relevance 0.94 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 0.93 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.92 · 34.8% (56 of 161 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 0.92 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 0.91 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.91 · 29.2% (47 of 161 decks)
- Termination Facilitator relevance 0.90 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.90 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 0.87 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Take the Bait relevance 0.85 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.85 · 32.3% (52 of 161 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.15 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 1.00 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Bounty Hunter relevance 0.99 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.95 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Starfield Mystic relevance 0.92 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Termination Facilitator relevance 0.90 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 0.90 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Breena, the Demagogue relevance 0.82 · 32.9% (53 of 161 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 0.70 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Nelly Borca, Impulsive Accuser relevance 0.69 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Alexios, Deimos of Kosmos relevance 0.68 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Agitator Ant relevance 0.68 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Tiana, Ship's Caretaker relevance 0.67 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Combat Calligrapher relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Bounty Board relevance 0.94 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.79 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
All enchantments (27)
- Curse of Bloodletting relevance 1.50 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 1.38 · 49.7% (80 of 161 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 1.28 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Misfortunes relevance 1.27 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 1.19 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Disturbance relevance 1.15 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Trespasser's Curse relevance 1.14 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Torment of Scarabs relevance 1.09 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Thirst relevance 1.09 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 1.05 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 1.03 · 22.4% (36 of 161 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 0.97 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
- Curse of the Nightly Hunt relevance 0.97 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.95 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Death's Hold relevance 0.93 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 0.91 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Fool's Wisdom relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Stalked Prey relevance 0.87 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.85 · 32.3% (52 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Chaos relevance 0.84 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Sigil of the Empty Throne relevance 0.83 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Rite of the Raging Storm relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Dictate of the Twin Gods relevance 0.73 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Obsession relevance 0.72 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Curse of Hospitality relevance 0.68 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.67 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Overwhelming Splendor relevance 0.67 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
All instants (4)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.92 · 34.8% (56 of 161 decks)
- Take the Bait relevance 0.85 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Immortal Obligation relevance 0.69 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 0.67 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Disrupt Decorum relevance 0.91 · 29.2% (47 of 161 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.74 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
EDH data for Bitter Feud: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 161 real decks.









































