Failed Inspection
Played in 137 Azorius decks
430+4+1+1+36+8+
Color Identity Spread
15.6% Azorius
Commanders
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.1% of decks
Whtz, the Bibliophile 1.1% of decks
Raff Capashen, Ship's Mage 1.4% of decks
Raff Capashen, Ship's Mage 1.4% of decks
Fluros of Myra's Marvels // Katerina of Myra's Marvels 50.0% of decks
Fluros of Myra's Marvels // Katerina of Myra's Marvels 50.0% of decks
Hunding Gjornersen 8.3% of decks
Hunding Gjornersen 8.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Contradict 45.3% of decks
Contradict 45.3% of decks
Dismiss 48.2% of decks
Dismiss 48.2% of decks
Grip of Amnesia 36.5% of decks
Grip of Amnesia 36.5% of decks
Deny Entry 38.0% of decks
Deny Entry 38.0% of decks
Exclude 40.9% of decks
Exclude 40.9% of decks
Flow of Knowledge 35.8% of decks
Flow of Knowledge 35.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.24 · 1.1% (73 of 6,514 decks)
- Raff Capashen, Ship's Mage relevance 1.17 · 1.4% (7 of 501 decks)
- Fluros of Myra's Marvels // Katerina of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.85 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Hunding Gjornersen relevance 0.62 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Contradict relevance 2.99 · 45.3% (62 of 137 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.89 · 48.2% (66 of 137 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.51 · 36.5% (50 of 137 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 2.40 · 38.0% (52 of 137 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.29 · 40.9% (56 of 137 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 2.25 · 35.8% (49 of 137 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 2.22 · 35.0% (48 of 137 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.19 · 36.5% (50 of 137 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.17 · 38.0% (52 of 137 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 2.07 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.06 · 41.6% (57 of 137 decks)
- Confound relevance 2.05 · 41.6% (57 of 137 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 2.05 · 38.0% (52 of 137 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.04 · 32.8% (45 of 137 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.03 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.01 · 32.8% (45 of 137 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.99 · 35.0% (48 of 137 decks)
- Eject relevance 1.99 · 33.6% (46 of 137 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 1.98 · 43.8% (60 of 137 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.96 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 1.96 · 29.9% (41 of 137 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.96 · 29.9% (41 of 137 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 1.96 · 29.9% (41 of 137 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.94 · 34.3% (47 of 137 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.94 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 1.93 · 32.1% (44 of 137 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.93 · 32.1% (44 of 137 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 1.93 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.92 · 27.7% (38 of 137 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.91 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 2.22 · 35.0% (48 of 137 decks)
- Duelist of the Mind relevance 1.83 · 31.4% (43 of 137 decks)
- Forgotten Creation relevance 1.83 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.81 · 27.0% (37 of 137 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Endless Atlas relevance 1.80 · 27.0% (37 of 137 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Compulsion relevance 1.84 · 29.2% (40 of 137 decks)
All instants (36)
- Contradict relevance 2.99 · 45.3% (62 of 137 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.89 · 48.2% (66 of 137 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.51 · 36.5% (50 of 137 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 2.40 · 38.0% (52 of 137 decks)
- Exclude relevance 2.29 · 40.9% (56 of 137 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 2.25 · 35.8% (49 of 137 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 2.19 · 36.5% (50 of 137 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 2.17 · 38.0% (52 of 137 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 2.06 · 41.6% (57 of 137 decks)
- Confound relevance 2.05 · 41.6% (57 of 137 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 2.05 · 38.0% (52 of 137 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 2.04 · 32.8% (45 of 137 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.03 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 2.01 · 32.8% (45 of 137 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.99 · 35.0% (48 of 137 decks)
- Eject relevance 1.99 · 33.6% (46 of 137 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 1.98 · 43.8% (60 of 137 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.96 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 1.96 · 29.9% (41 of 137 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.96 · 29.9% (41 of 137 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.94 · 34.3% (47 of 137 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 1.93 · 32.1% (44 of 137 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.93 · 32.1% (44 of 137 decks)
- Fall of the Gavel relevance 1.93 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.91 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.86 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.85 · 27.0% (37 of 137 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 1.85 · 31.4% (43 of 137 decks)
- Farm // Market relevance 1.84 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 1.83 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Flash Counter relevance 1.82 · 27.0% (37 of 137 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 1.81 · 31.4% (43 of 137 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.80 · 28.5% (39 of 137 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 1.80 · 26.3% (36 of 137 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.80 · 27.7% (38 of 137 decks)
- Decoy Gambit relevance 1.80 · 27.7% (38 of 137 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Drag Under relevance 2.07 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 1.96 · 29.9% (41 of 137 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.94 · 30.7% (42 of 137 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.92 · 27.7% (38 of 137 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.87 · 27.7% (38 of 137 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 1.87 · 31.4% (43 of 137 decks)
- Divination relevance 1.84 · 37.2% (51 of 137 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 1.80 · 29.2% (40 of 137 decks)
EDH data for Failed Inspection: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 137 real decks.





























