Into the Fire
Played in 240 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 2.06 · 1.5% (37 of 2,402 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.53 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hostile Negotiations relevance 0.87 · 15.0% (36 of 240 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (37 of 240 decks)
- Yahenni's Expertise relevance 0.86 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Ill-Timed Explosion relevance 0.83 · 15.8% (38 of 240 decks)
- Micromancer relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Cursed Recording relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.68 · 20.4% (49 of 240 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.67 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Yusri, Fortune's Flame relevance 0.66 · 10.8% (26 of 240 decks)
- Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.66 · 10.0% (24 of 240 decks)
- Hostile Takeover relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (28 of 240 decks)
- Perplex relevance 0.65 · 16.3% (39 of 240 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.65 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.64 · 50.0% (120 of 240 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.62 · 19.6% (47 of 240 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (43 of 240 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (40 of 240 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.61 · 17.1% (41 of 240 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.61 · 15.4% (37 of 240 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.61 · 49.6% (119 of 240 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.61 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.61 · 15.8% (38 of 240 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.60 · 42.1% (101 of 240 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.60 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Maestros Charm relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (38 of 240 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.59 · 21.3% (51 of 240 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Blood Pet relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Micromancer relevance 0.82 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Yusri, Fortune's Flame relevance 0.66 · 10.8% (26 of 240 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.60 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Blood Pet relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (36 of 240 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Cursed Recording relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.64 · 50.0% (120 of 240 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.61 · 49.6% (119 of 240 decks)
- Rakdos Signet relevance 0.57 · 42.9% (103 of 240 decks)
All instants (20)
- Hostile Negotiations relevance 0.87 · 15.0% (36 of 240 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (37 of 240 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.68 · 20.4% (49 of 240 decks)
- Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.66 · 10.0% (24 of 240 decks)
- Perplex relevance 0.65 · 16.3% (39 of 240 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.65 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.62 · 19.6% (47 of 240 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (43 of 240 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (40 of 240 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.61 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.61 · 15.8% (38 of 240 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.60 · 42.1% (101 of 240 decks)
- Maestros Charm relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (38 of 240 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.59 · 21.3% (51 of 240 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Kolaghan's Command relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.55 · 8.8% (21 of 240 decks)
- Cathartic Pyre relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (23 of 240 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.54 · 19.2% (46 of 240 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Yahenni's Expertise relevance 0.86 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Ill-Timed Explosion relevance 0.83 · 15.8% (38 of 240 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.67 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Hostile Takeover relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (28 of 240 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.61 · 17.1% (41 of 240 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.61 · 15.4% (37 of 240 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.57 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.53 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Seething Landscape relevance 0.86 · 40.0% (96 of 240 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.77 · 17.9% (43 of 240 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.65 · 20.8% (50 of 240 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.60 · 17.5% (42 of 240 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (50 of 240 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (36 of 240 decks)
All lands (3)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.56 · 25.0% (60 of 240 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.56 · 45.4% (109 of 240 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.54 · 32.9% (79 of 240 decks)
EDH data for Into the Fire: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 240 real decks.