Eye of Doom
Played in 47 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (4)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 3.65 · 4.2% (41 of 968 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Master Chef relevance 0.82 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.69 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- M'Baku, Jabari Chieftain relevance 0.52 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 5.11 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Wild Endeavor relevance 5.09 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Say Its Name relevance 4.96 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Molt Tender relevance 4.78 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 4.74 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Recollect relevance 4.44 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 4.44 · 70.2% (33 of 47 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 4.37 · 91.5% (43 of 47 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 4.26 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 4.20 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 4.13 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 4.12 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 4.04 · 59.6% (28 of 47 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 4.03 · 78.7% (37 of 47 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 4.00 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 3.98 · 85.1% (40 of 47 decks)
- Tato Farmer relevance 3.81 · 70.2% (33 of 47 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 3.80 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 3.76 · 85.1% (40 of 47 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 3.76 · 87.2% (41 of 47 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 3.71 · 78.7% (37 of 47 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 3.71 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 3.71 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Revive relevance 3.67 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 3.63 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 3.62 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 3.59 · 87.2% (41 of 47 decks)
- Lull relevance 3.56 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 3.46 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 3.34 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Molt Tender relevance 4.78 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Rift Sower relevance 4.74 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 4.44 · 70.2% (33 of 47 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 4.13 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 4.03 · 78.7% (37 of 47 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 3.98 · 85.1% (40 of 47 decks)
- Tato Farmer relevance 3.81 · 70.2% (33 of 47 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 2.53 · 74.5% (35 of 47 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 2.32 · 61.7% (29 of 47 decks)
- Trickster's Elk relevance 2.19 · 48.9% (23 of 47 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 2.05 · 46.8% (22 of 47 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 5.11 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 4.37 · 91.5% (43 of 47 decks)
- Perilous Vault relevance 4.26 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 4.04 · 59.6% (28 of 47 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 2.47 · 59.6% (28 of 47 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Lignify relevance 1.84 · 63.8% (30 of 47 decks)
All instants (7)
- Season of Renewal relevance 4.20 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 3.76 · 85.1% (40 of 47 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 3.76 · 87.2% (41 of 47 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 3.59 · 87.2% (41 of 47 decks)
- Lull relevance 3.56 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 3.46 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 3.15 · 85.1% (40 of 47 decks)
All sorceries (19)
- Wild Endeavor relevance 5.09 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Say Its Name relevance 4.96 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Recollect relevance 4.44 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 4.12 · 76.6% (36 of 47 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 4.00 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 3.80 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 3.71 · 78.7% (37 of 47 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 3.71 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 3.71 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Revive relevance 3.67 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 3.63 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 3.62 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 3.34 · 83.0% (39 of 47 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 3.03 · 78.7% (37 of 47 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 2.99 · 63.8% (30 of 47 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 2.85 · 72.3% (34 of 47 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 2.39 · 87.2% (41 of 47 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 2.03 · 48.9% (23 of 47 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 1.83 · 53.2% (25 of 47 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Trenchpost relevance 5.30 · 78.7% (37 of 47 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 4.15 · 80.9% (38 of 47 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 3.58 · 87.2% (41 of 47 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 3.55 · 63.8% (30 of 47 decks)
- Capital City relevance 3.16 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- Mariposa Military Base relevance 3.08 · 57.4% (27 of 47 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 2.41 · 46.8% (22 of 47 decks)
EDH data for Eye of Doom: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 47 real decks.